Brief

National Academy of Sciences

The claims the writer was given for National Academy of Sciences, in the order they were given.

1. 1

   The Condon Report was reviewed and approved by the National Academy of Sciences in 1969.

   “The report was reviewed and approved by the National Academy of Sciences in 1969, leaving the field of UFO research wide open for charlatans and hoaxers of all kinds.”

   Messengers of Deception: UFO Contacts and Cults 0101-01-01 ch6:6105-6265 administrative first hand

2. 2

   Approval of the Condon Report by the National Academy of Sciences left the field of Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) research open to charlatans and hoaxers.

   “leaving the field of UFO research wide open for charlatans and hoaxers of all kinds”

   Messengers of Deception: UFO Contacts and Cults 0101-01-01 ch6:6187-6265 opinion first hand

3. 3

   In November 1968, the United States National Academy of Sciences reviewed and endorsed the conclusions of the Condon Report.

   “In November 1968, it sought and received a rubber-stamp from the National Academy of Sciences, who reviewed and endorsed the report’s conclusions.”

   In Plain Sight 2023-11-17 ch10:23438-23572 administrative

4. 4

   One line of effort for the AARO Historical Record Report (HR2) was to partner with the United States National Archives on locating Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) data, refining requests based on new leads derived from historical interviews and open-source and classified research.

   “Partner with the U.S. National Archives on locating UAP data, refining requests based on the discovery of new leads derived from historical interviews, as well as open-source and classified research.”

   Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), Volume I 2024-02-01 char:22672-22864 administrative second hand

5. 5

   The All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) partnered with the United States National Archives to examine the records from the United States Air Force's Project BLUE BOOK, which spanned from 1947 to 1969.

   “AARO partnered with the U.S. National Archives to examine the records from the USAF's Project BLUE BOOK, which spanned from 1947 to 1969.”

   Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), Volume I 2024-02-01 char:45410-45542 administrative first hand

6. 6

   After the Condon Report was criticised by some scientists, including Project BLUE BOOK's Dr. J. Allen Hynek, a panel of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) was tasked in late 1968 to examine the rigour, methodology, and conclusions of the Condon Report.

   “After the Condon Report was criticized by some scientists - including Project BLUE BOOK's Dr. Hynek - a panel of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) was tasked in late 1968 to examine the rigor, methodology, and conclusions of the Condon Report.”

   Report on the Historical Record of U.S. Government Involvement with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), Volume I 2024-02-01 char:51999-52240 administrative