Brief
Douglas Dean Johnson
The claims the writer was given for Douglas Dean Johnson, in the order they were given.
1
Douglas Dean Johnson considers the National Defense Authorization Act 2023 (NDAA) UAP legislation to reflect a perception among key members of Congress that important information on the subject may have been appropriately classified but that much important data has been 'stovepiped' - sealed within specific projects or programs in ways that impeded meaningful progress and congressional oversight.
“He says, ‘I believe that the legislation reflects a perception, by some key members of Congress, that there is important information on this subject to which classification may have been appropriate, but that much important data has been “stovepiped” – sealed up within specific projects or programs in ways that have impeded meaningful progress towards coming fully to grips with the entire scope of UAP, and perhaps also stymied meaningful congressional oversight.”
In Plain Sight 2023-11-17 ch30:21079-21535 opinion first hand
2
Douglas Dean Johnson considers it possible that much important UAP data may have been lost, forgotten, or hidden under premises that are no longer applicable.
“Much important data may have been lost, forgotten, or hidden under premises that are no longer applicable.’6”
In Plain Sight 2023-11-17 ch30:21546-21653 opinion first hand
3
D. Dean Johnson published a critique arguing that Harald Malmgren did not work on the United States National Security Council.
“So this whole D. Dean Johnson takedown around him not working on the National Security Council”
Jesse Michels, UAPGerb & Chris Ramsay - Flying Saucer Diner 2026-07-17 00:16:12.5-00:16:17.4 administrative first hand