Brief
Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV)
The claims the writer was given for Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), in the order they were given.
1
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was reported to be an elongated egg or 'Tic Tac' shape with a discernable midline horizontal axis.
“which was reported to be "an elongated egg or a 'Tic Tac' shape with a discernable midline horizontal axis"”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:1024-1126 observation
2
On 2004-11-14, an E-2C Hawkeye Naval Flight Officer (NFO) of Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron 117 (VAW-117) was airborne during the contact with the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) and was also the squadron's avionics division officer responsible for radar recordings.
“On 14 November 2004, {{redacted: ~2 words}} E-2C NFO, was in VAW-117 and airborne during the contact. Additionally, he was the squadron's avionics division officer and would be responsible for any and all RADAR recordings, etc...”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:10349-10572 administrative second hand
3
A Lieutenant of Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron 117 (VAW-117) was flying as the Air Control Officer (ACO) on the mission where the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was observed by the flight of F/A-18s.
“LT {{redacted: ~1 word}} was flying as the Air Control Officer (ACO) on the mission where the AAV was observed by the flight of F/A-18s.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:10811-10943 administrative second hand
4
The Air Control Officer of the E-2C Hawkeye did not see the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) on his radar until USS Princeton (CG-59) directed the contact and gave the E-2C the general direction to steer its radar.
“He did not see the object on his radar (raw video) until the USS Princeton directed the contact and gave the E-2 the general direction to steer its radar.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:11068-11216 observation second hand
5
The Air Control Officer of the E-2C Hawkeye initially thought the radar return of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was a wave, because in a high sea state the E-2C Hawkeye radar can detect waves.
“LT {{redacted: ~1 word}} initially thought the return was a wave because in a high sea state (4 or greater) the E-2C RADAR can actually detect the waves.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:11223-11370 observation second hand
6
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was solid white, smooth, and had no edges.
“It was "solid white, smooth, with no edges.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:1133-1170 observation
7
The radar target of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was so low and the return so faint that without inputs from USS Princeton (CG-59) the E-2C Hawkeye's return would have been missed or ignored.
“Additionally, the target was so low and the return was so faint that without the inputs from the USS Princeton the return would have been missed/ignored.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:11377-11522 observation
8
USS Princeton (CG-59) initially reported the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) target to be at approximately 4,600 to 6,100 metres mean sea level.
“This was even more interesting because the USS Princeton initially reported the target to be at 15,000 - 20,000 feet MSL.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:11531-11648 measurement second hand
9
The velocity of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was unavailable to the E-2C Hawkeye due to the intermittent radar return from the target.
“Due to the intermittent radar return from the target, velocity was unavailable.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:11653-11720 observation
10
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was approximately 14 metres in length.
“It was approximately 46 feet in length.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:1177-1209 measurement
11
The F/A-18Fs' radar could not obtain a lock on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), but it could be tracked while stationary and at slower speeds with the Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR).
“The F/A-18Fs radar could not obtain a 'lock' on the AAV; however it could be tracked while stationary and at slower speeds with the Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR).”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:1217-1375 observation
12
F/A-18 pilots and weapon system operators from Strike Fighter Squadron 41 (VFA-41) obtained both a visual and sensor contact with the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) on 2004-11-14 at approximately N31 20' W117 10', about 130 kilometres south of the U.S./Mexico border and 56 kilometres off the Baja Mexico coast.
“This section provides the debrief of the F/A-18 pilots and weapon system operators (WSOs) from VFA-41 that were able to get both a visual and sensor contact with the AAV on 14 November 2004 at approximately N31 20' W117 10' about 70nm south of the U.S./Mexico Border 30 nm off the Baja Mexico Coast (Figure 1).”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:12429-12736 observation second hand
13
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) took evasive action upon intercept by the F/A-18, demonstrating advanced acceleration, aerodynamic, and propulsion capability.
“The AAV did take evasive actions upon intercept by the F/A-18 demonstrating an advanced acceleration (G), aerodynamic, and propulsion capability.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:1382-1516 observation
14
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was reported to be at slow speed and low altitude.
“The object was reported to be at "slow speed and low altitude".”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:14037-14090 observation
15
While en route at approximately 460 kilometres per hour indicated (approximately 740 kilometres per hour ground speed) at medium altitude between approximately 4,600 and 7,600 metres, the Commanding Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232) gained radar contact of what he believed to be two F/A-18Fs approaching the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) from the west at low altitude, between approximately 150 and 1,500 metres.
“While enroute at approximately 250 knots indicated/400 knots groundspeed at medium altitude (15-25,000 feet), he gained radar contact of what he believed to be two F/A-18Fs that were approaching the AAV from the west at low altitude (500-5,000 feet).”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:14101-14345 observation first hand
16
The Commanding Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232) observed no other traffic on his radar besides the two F/A-18Fs approaching the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“There was no other traffic on the radar.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:14352-14386 observation first hand
17
The controller informed the Commanding Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232) to remain above approximately 3,000 metres, as there was other fighter traffic at low altitude investigating the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“The controller informed him to remain above 10,000 feet, as there was other fighter traffic at low altitude investigating the AAV.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:14393-14519 testimony first hand
18
As the Commanding Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232) approached approximately 28 kilometres from the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) while descending through approximately 4,600 metres, he could see a water disturbance on the ocean surface.
“As he approached approximately 15nm from the AAV descending through approximately 15,000 feet, he could see a water disturbance in the ocean surface.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:14524-14665 observation first hand
19
At approximately 9 to 19 kilometres away from the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), the controller told the Commanding Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232) to 'skip it' and return to his operating area.
“At approximately 5-10 nm away from the AAV, the controller told him to "skip it" and return to his operating area.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:14721-14830 testimony first hand
20
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) did not take any offensive action against the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11).
“The AAV did not take any offensive action against the CSG”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:1528-1582 observation
21
The Commanding Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232) never made visual contact with the other fighter aircraft vectored to the location, nor with the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) itself.
“He also never made visual contact with the other fighter aircraft that were vectored to the location or the AAV.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:15631-15739 observation first hand
22
The Commanding Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232) considered it possible that the water disturbance was caused by an Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) that was 'cloaked' or invisible to the human eye.
“It is possible that the disturbance was being caused by an AAV but that the AAV was 'cloaked' or invisible to the human eye.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:15744-15864 opinion first hand
23
The Commanding Officer of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232) reported to the Carrier Intelligence Center (CVIC) after his flight and was asked by his Intelligence Officer whether he had seen the 'supersonic Tic Tac'.
“He reported to the Carrier Intelligence Center (CVIC) and was asked by his Intelligence Officer, 1stLt {{redacted: ~2 words}} if he saw the "supersonic Tic Tac"?”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:15951-16107 testimony first hand
24
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) demonstrated the potential to conduct undetected reconnaissance against the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11), leaving the CSG with a limited ability to detect, track, and/or engage it.
“given its ability to operate unchallenged in close vicinity to the CSG it demonstrated the potential to conduct undetected reconnaissance leaving the CSG with a limited ability to detect, track, and/or engage the AAV.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:1596-1809 opinion
25
An Intelligence Officer at the Carrier Intelligence Center (CVIC) was not involved in any further discussions concerning the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) beyond his position there at the time.
“We questioned now Capt. {{redacted: ~2 words}} to determine if he had any further information but based on his position in CVIC at the time he was not involved in any further discussions concerning the AAV.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:16113-16315 testimony second hand
26
David Fravor was the pilot of FastEagle 01, one of two F/A-18Fs of Strike Fighter Squadron 41 (VFA-41) involved in the intercept and visual contact with the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) on 2004-11-14.
“FASTEAGLE 01 Pilot: CDR David 'Sex' Fravor, USN/WSO: LT {{redacted: ~3 words}}, USN”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:16388-16470 administrative second hand
27
Alex Dietrich was the pilot of FastEagle 02, one of two F/A-18Fs of Strike Fighter Squadron 41 (VFA-41) involved in the intercept and visual contact with the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) on 2004-11-14.
“FASTEAGLE 02 Pilot: LT Alex 'Cardiac' Dietrich, USN/WSO: LCDR {{redacted: ~2 words}}, USN”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:16476-16564 administrative second hand
28
David Fravor's flight descended to between approximately 6,100 and 7,300 metres and proceeded toward the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) contact.
“The flight descended to between 20-24,000 feet and proceeded to the contact.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:17378-17446 observation first hand
29
David Fravor did not recall any indication of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) via his aircraft's on-board sensors.
“CDR Fravor did not recall any indications via on-board sensor of the object.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:17455-17524 observation first hand
30
David Fravor's F/A-18F was not carrying a Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) pod onboard during the intercept of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“Their aircraft was not carrying a Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) pod onboard.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:17532-17602 administrative
31
David Fravor recalled that the Radar Attack Display in his F/A-18F was clean, with no targets, during the approach to the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“As CDR Fravor remembers it, the Radar Attack Display was clean (no targets).”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:17611-17678 observation first hand
32
David Fravor's crew received situational awareness of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) initially via sporadic Link-16 tracks from an off-board sensor.
“Situational awareness to the object was initially received via sporadic Link-16 tracks (Link-16 is a time division multiple access data-link) via an off-board sensor.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:17948-18107 observation first hand
33
David Fravor's weapon system operator assumed that the off-board sensor providing Link-16 data on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was USS Princeton (CG-59)'s AN/SPY-1 radar.
“Lt {{redacted: ~1 word}} assumed that the sensor providing the information was the USS Princeton's SPY-1 radar.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:18115-18220 opinion first hand
34
David Fravor's first indication of the unknown contact was a visual of a disturbance on the water below the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), after which he gained visual on the object itself.
“According to CDR Fravor the first indication he had of the unknown contact was a visual of a disturbance on the water below the AAV. As he scanned the area he gained a visual on the object.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:18227-18409 observation first hand
35
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was assessed to be no known aircraft or air vehicle currently in the inventory of the United States or any foreign nation.
“The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was no known aircraft or air vehicle currently in the inventory of the United States or any foreign nation.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:1837-1972 opinion
36
David Fravor described the water disturbance below the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) as localised underneath the object, not appearing as a trail or wake, and looking like frothy waves and foam almost as if the water was boiling.
“when asked to describe the disturbance on the water he stated that it was localized underneath the object, did not appear as a trail or wake, and looked like frothy waves and foam almost as if the water was boiling.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:18446-18653 observation first hand
37
David Fravor attempted a 'helmet lock' on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) that was unsuccessful.
“CDR Fravor attempted a "helmet lock" that was unsuccessful.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:18804-18850 observation first hand
38
David Fravor said the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was 'holding like a Harrier', referring to the AV-8B Harrier jet's ability to hover and perform Vertical/Short Takeoff and Landing (V/STOL) via thrust vectoring.
“CDR Fravor stated that the object was "holding like a Harrier." (Referring to the AV-8B jet aircraft, which is capable of hovering and Vertical/Short Takeoff and Landing (V/STOL) via thrust vectoring.)”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:19522-19712 observation first hand
39
David Fravor described the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV)'s shape as like an elongated egg or a 'Tic Tac', with a discernable midline horizontal axis.
“According to CDR Fravor, the object's shape was like an elongated egg or a 'Tic Tac' and had a discernable midline horizontal axis.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:19724-19850 observation first hand
40
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) exhibited advanced low observable characteristics at multiple radar bands, rendering US radar-based engagement capabilities ineffective.
“The AAV exhibited advanced low observable characteristics at multiple radar bands rendering US radar based engagement capabilities ineffective.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:1982-2113 opinion
41
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) observed by David Fravor was uniformly white across its entire body.
“However, the object was uniformly white across the entire body.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:19856-19914 observation first hand
42
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) appeared solid white, smooth, with no edges, uniformly coloured with no nacelles, pylons, or wings.
“solid white, smooth, with no edges. It was uniformly colored with no nacelles, pylons, or wings.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:20002-20092 observation first hand
43
A witness pilot described the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) as looking like it had a white candy-coated shell, almost like a white board, neither glowing nor reflecting sunlight.
“"neither, it looked like it had a white candy-coated shell, almost like a white board."”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:20184-20263 observation
44
A pilot's report of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) differed from David Fravor's account in that he described the object travelling level at approximately 150-300 metres altitude at approximately 930 kilometres per hour.
“His report differs from CDR Fravor in that he reported the object traveling level at approximately 500-1000 feet at approximately 500 knots.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:20271-20405 observation
45
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was pointed in a north/south orientation and moved both north/south and east/west while maintaining a consistent altitude.
“The object was pointed in a north/south orientation and was moving both north & south and east & west, while maintaining a consistent altitude.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:20413-20547 observation first hand
46
David Fravor described the displacements of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) as minor.
“These displacements, according to CDR Fravor, were minor.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:20557-20608 observation first hand
47
David Fravor began a descent with the intention of taking a close aboard pass with the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) in an attempt to visually identify it.
“CDR Fravor stated he then began a descent with the intention to take a close aboard pass with the object in an attempt to visually identify it.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:20615-20755 testimony first hand
48
David Fravor's flight began the descent toward the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) from about 3,000 metres and approximately 650 kilometres per hour.
“They began the decent as they rolled in from about 10,000ft and approximately 350 knots to take the object close aboard.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:20759-20872 measurement first hand
49
David Fravor pulled nose on and then pulled trail (aft) of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) while manoeuvring near it.
“CDR Fravor pulled nose on and then pulled trail (aft) of the object.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:20880-20941 observation first hand
50
David Fravor assessed that the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) appeared to recognise his aircraft, judging from the object realigning its axis to point in the direction of his aircraft.
“the object appeared, according to CDR Fravor: "to recognize us." He assessed this from the fact the object "pointed" (realigned it's axis) in the direction of their aircraft.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:20975-21140 observation first hand
51
David Fravor observed that the disturbance on the water ceased at the time the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) appeared to point toward his aircraft.
“At this time, according to CDR Fravor, the disturbance on the water ceased.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:21150-21218 observation first hand
52
As David Fravor's flight completed their manoeuvre, the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) ascended quickly and pulled a lift vector on and aft of them at a supersonic speed.
“As they completed this maneuver, the object ascended quickly and pulled lift vector on and aft of them at a supersonic speed.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:21227-21346 observation first hand
53
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) exhibited advanced aerodynamic performance with no visible control surfaces and no visible means to generate lift.
“The AAV exhibited advanced aerodynamic performance with no visible control surfaces and no visible means to generate lift.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:2128-2245 opinion
54
USS Princeton (CG-59) initially reported that its radar picture was clean, with no contact, then reported that the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) had flown to David Fravor's flight's combat air patrol station, located in the southern end of the training area, having climbed to approximately 7,300 metres.
“Poison initially reported that the "picture was clean" (no contact) but then stated "you're not going to believe this, its at your CAP" meaning that the AAV had flown to their training CAP, which was located in the southern end of the training area and had climbed to approximately 24,000 feet.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:21455-21744 observation second hand
55
David Fravor's flight attempted to locate both the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) and the water disturbance with no success.
“CDR Fravor stated that the flight attempted to locate both the object and the disturbance with no success.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:21750-21848 observation first hand
56
Following the engagement with the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), David Fravor's flight rejoined and returned to USS Nimitz (CVN-68).
“Following the engagement, the flight rejoined and returned to the USS Nimitz.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:21991-22061 observation
57
When asked how the jets functioned during the encounter, a member of David Fravor's flight said the jets were brand new, with less than 100 hours on them, and were working perfectly.
“the jets were brand new, less than 100 hrs on them. They were working perfectly.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:22179-22249 testimony
58
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) exhibited advanced propulsion capability by remaining stationary with little to no variation in altitude then transitioning to horizontal and/or vertical velocities far greater than any known aerial vehicle, with little to no visible signature.
“The AAV exhibited advanced propulsion capability by demonstrating the ability to remain stationary with little to no variation in altitude transitioning to horizontal and/or vertical velocities far greater than any known aerial vehicle with little to no visible signature.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:2253-2515 opinion
59
An F/A-18F pilot who flew alongside David Fravor was not asked to sign any non-disclosure agreement regarding the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) encounter and is uncertain how far up the chain of command the reporting went past his commanding officer.
“He was not asked to sign any non-disclosure agreement and he is uncertain how far up the chain the reporting went past his commanding officer.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:23045-23179 testimony
60
David Fravor's flight crew told Chad Underwood's flight crew what they had seen of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) and asked them to try to see and record what they could.
“FASTEAGLE flight told LT Underwood's flight what they saw and to try to see and record what they could.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:23679-23776 observation
61
Initial awareness of the object detected by Chad Underwood's flight came via the radar, with initial tracks at approximately 55-74 kilometres to the south of the aircraft.
“Initial awareness of an object came via the radar. According to the radar display, the initial tracks were at approximately 30-40 nm to the south of the aircraft.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:24591-24744 measurement
62
Chad Underwood attempted multiple times to transition the radar to Single Target Track (STT) mode on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) but the radar could not take a lock.
“LT Underwood was controlling the radar and FLIR and attempted multiple times to transition the radar to Single Target Track (STT) mode on the object. The radar could not take a lock, the b-sweep would raster around the hit, build an initial aspect vector (which never stabilized) and then would drop and continue normal RWS b-sweep.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:24754-25080 observation first hand
63
Chad Underwood said there were no jamming cues, such as strobe or champagne bubbles, or any normal electronic-attack indications, on his radar while attempting to track the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“When asked, LT Underwood stated that there were no jamming cues (strobe, champagne bubbles, "any normal EA indications"). It "just appeared as if the radar couldn't hack it."”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:25087-25257 observation first hand
64
USS Princeton (CG-59) detected multiple Anomalous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) operating in and around the vicinity of the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) on several occasions.
“The USS Princeton on several occasions detected multiple Anomalous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) operating in and around the vicinity of the CSG.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:252-386 observation second hand
65
The radar on Chad Underwood's aircraft could not receive enough information to create a single target track file on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“The radar couldn't receive enough information to create a single target track file.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:25262-25340 observation
66
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) possibly demonstrated the ability to 'cloak' or become invisible to the human eye or human observation.
“The AAV possibly demonstrated the ability to 'cloak' or become invisible to the human eye or human observation.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:2528-2627 opinion
67
The Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) on Chad Underwood's aircraft showed the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) at 0 degrees angle track antenna and approximately -5 degrees elevation.
“The FLIR showed an object at 0 ATA and approximately -5deg elevation (Figure 2).”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:25447-25524 measurement
68
Chad Underwood estimated the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) to be co-altitude with his aircraft or a few thousand feet below, estimating the object to be between approximately 4,600 and 6,100 metres.
“According to LT Underwood, "the target was best guess co-altitude or a few thousand feet below," estimating the object to be between 15-20 thousand feet.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:25528-25702 measurement first hand
69
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) appeared stationary on the Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) display, with no discernible movement other than closure resulting from the aircraft's own movement.
“The object, according to the FLIR, appeared stationary (Figure 3). There was no discernable movement from the object with the only closure being a result of the aircraft's movement.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:25708-25880 observation
70
As Chad Underwood watched the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) it began to move out of the Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) field of view to the left, and he made no attempt to slew the FLIR, losing situational awareness of the object.
“As LT Underwood watched the object it began to move out of FLIR field of view to the left. LT Underwood made no attempt to slew the FLIR and subsequently lost situational awareness to the object.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:25890-26078 observation first hand
71
Chad Underwood's flight continued with the training mission with no further contact with the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“The Flight continued with training mission with no further contact with object.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:26086-26158 observation
72
A Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) image in White Hot Mode captured by Chad Underwood's aircraft showed a faint bright object against a dark background.
“[image: FLIR image in White Hot Mode showing a faint bright object against a dark background, labeled Figure 2.]”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:26168-26276 observation second hand
73
A Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) image in Black Hot mode captured by Chad Underwood's aircraft showed a faint dark object against a lighter background.
“[image: FLIR image in Black Hot mode showing a faint dark object against a lighter background, labeled Figure 3.]”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:26306-26415 observation second hand
74
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) possibly demonstrated a highly advanced capability to operate undersea completely undetectable by the most advanced sensors available.
“The AAV possibly demonstrated a highly advanced capability to operate undersea completely undetectable by our most advanced sensors.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:2642-2766 opinion
75
Copies were made of the Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) tapes of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), with a set turned into the intelligence section.
“Copies of the tapes were made with a set being turned into the intelligence section.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:26975-27051 administrative
76
Chad Underwood was not asked to sign any non-disclosure agreement regarding the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) encounter and is uncertain how far up the chain of command the reporting went past his commanding officer.
“LT Underwood was not asked to sign any non-disclosure agreement and he is uncertain how far up the chain the reporting went past his commanding officer.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:27060-27204 testimony first hand
77
USS Louisville (SSN-724) was operating in the vicinity of USS Nimitz (CVN-68) as part of the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) during the detection and intercept of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“She was operating in the vicinity of the USS Nimitz as part of the CSG during the detection and intercept of the AAV.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:27572-27711 administrative
78
A former submarine officer who served aboard USS Louisville (SSN-724) in November 2004 during the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) activity said there were no unidentified sonar contacts in the vicinity of the aerial sightings or at any time during operations off the coast of California.
“According to former LT {{redacted: ~3 words}} now a civilian working for the US Navy, who was a qualified Submarine Officer onboard the Louisville in November 2004 during the AAV activity there were no unidentified sonar contacts in the vicinity of the aerial sightings or at anytime during the operations off the coast of California.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:27716-28039 testimony
79
The former commanding officer of USS Louisville (SSN-724) confirmed that there was no anomalous undersea activity during the period of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) sightings.
“The former commander of the USS Louisville, CAPT {{redacted: ~2 words}} confirmed that there was no anomalous undersea activity during this period.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:28051-28191 testimony
80
USS Louisville (SSN-724) conducted a live fire exercise during the period of and in the vicinity of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) sightings, but the weapon used did not match the flight profile or visible characteristics of the AAV.
“There was a live fire exercise conducted by the USS Louisville during the period of and in the vicinity of the AAV sightings; however, the weapon in use did not match the flight profile or visible characteristics of the AAV.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:28199-28419 observation
81
Based on the lack of detection of unidentified sonar contacts, the report assessed it highly unlikely that the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) operated below the surface of the ocean, though it is possible the AAV demonstrated the ability to be cloaked or invisible to the human eye based on pilot reporting of water disturbance with no visible craft.
“Based on the lack of detection of any unidentified sonar contacts it is highly unlikely that an AAV operated below the surface of the ocean; it is possible that the AAV demonstrated the ability to be cloaked or invisible to the human eye based on pilot reporting of the water disturbance with no visible craft.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:28678-28982 opinion second hand
82
A US Navy assessment held that if the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) did operate underwater undetected, it would represent a highly advanced capability given the advanced capability of US Navy sensors.
“Based on the assessment of Mr. {{redacted: ~2 words}} if the AAV did operate underwater undetected it would represent a highly advanced capability given the advanced capability of our sensors.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:28989-29173 opinion
83
On 2004-11-14, following the intercept of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), David Fravor reported to the Carrier Intelligence Center (CVIC) to debrief with Intelligence and discussed the entire mission and AAV contact with the Carrier Air Wing Intelligence Officer.
“On 14 November following the intercept of the AAV, CDR Fravor reported to CVIC to debrief with Intelligence. He discussed the entire mission and AAV contact with LCDR {{redacted: ~2 words}} the Carrier Air Wing Intelligence Officer.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:29711-29935 administrative
84
The Carrier Air Wing Intelligence Officer said that when David Fravor's report of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) came in, he wasn't sure what to do.
“According to LCDR {{redacted: ~1 word}} he "wasn't sure what to do".”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:29944-30008 testimony
85
The Carrier Air Wing Intelligence Officer said that he and his colleagues initially didn't take David Fravor's report of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) seriously, but had no reason to question the report given that it came from an experienced and well-respected F/A-18 squadron commanding officer.
“He also stated that they "didn't take it seriously" at first; however, they had absolutely no reason to question the report from a very experienced and well-respected F/A-18 squadron commanding officer.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:30013-30207 testimony
86
The Carrier Air Wing Intelligence Officer said the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) report likely would have received less attention had it come from a less-experienced aviator than David Fravor.
“LCDR {{redacted: ~1 word}} added that they likely would have not given as much attention if it came from a lesser-experienced aviator.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:30216-30342 opinion
87
The Carrier Air Wing Intelligence Officer reported David Fravor's account of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) to the Commander of Carrier Air Wing 11 (CVW-11), a highly experienced aviator who did not take it very seriously.
“He reported it to the Commander of the Air Wing, CAPT {{redacted: ~2 words}} also a highly experienced aviator but he did not take it very serious.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:30351-30490 observation
88
The Carrier Air Wing Intelligence Officer completed an email-based mission report (MISREP) on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) encounter, submitted via email because the F/A-18s were on a training mission.
“LCDR {{redacted: ~1 word}} completed an email based MISREP. It was submitted via email because the F/A-18s were on a training mission.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:30499-30625 administrative
89
The email-based mission report on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) encounter, including the Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) video, was sent via a secure system to Third Fleet Intelligence (N2), the higher echelon command.
“The email-based report including the FLIR video was sent via a secure system to CAPT {{redacted: ~2 words}} at 3rd Fleet Intelligence, their higher echelon command.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:30634-30790 administrative
90
The Carrier Air Wing Intelligence Officer detailed the high level of ridicule that the aircrew experienced over the weeks following the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) reporting.
“Finally, LCDR {{redacted: ~1 word}} admitted and detailed the high level of ridicule that the aircrew experienced over the next few weeks.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:30799-30970 testimony
91
The CSG-11 Senior Intelligence Officer (N2) confirmed that CSG leadership asked him whether any additional reporting was required regarding the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) encounter, and he advised that since they were in a training environment, an email-based mission report to Third Fleet Intelligence (N2) was the only report required.
“The following details were also confirmed with CAPT {{redacted}} the CSG-11 Senior Intelligence Officer (N2). Capt {{redacted}} confirmed that the CSG leadership asked him if any additional reporting was required and he advised that since they were in a training environment an email based MISREP to 3rd Fleet N2 was the only report required.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:30981-31314 testimony
92
The CSG-11 Senior Intelligence Officer (N2), when asked what he thought the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was, replied that he believed it was part of a counterdrug operation based on the area of operations.
“When asked what he thought the AAV was he replied that he believed it was part of a counterdrug operation based on the area of operations.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:31324-31451 opinion
93
The Third Fleet N2 at the time of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) event has since retired from the United States Navy and could not be located.
“The 3rd Fleet N2 at the time of the event was CAPT {{redacted}}. CAPT {{redacted}} has since retired from the US Navy and could not be located; however, his deputy N2 was CAPT {{redacted}}.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:31497-31675 administrative
94
The deputy N2 of Third Fleet Intelligence confirmed that the mission report (MISREP) on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was received via email on or about 2004-11-14.
“CAPT {{redacted}} confirmed that the MISREP was received via email on or about 14 November 2004.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:31687-31778 testimony
95
The deputy N2 of Third Fleet Intelligence said the mission report (MISREP) on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), completed during training and preparation for deployment, was read and acknowledged by Third Fleet Intelligence (N2) but was not forwarded up the chain of command.
“Since this MISREP was completed during training and preparation for deployment it was read and acknowledged by 3rd Fleet N2 but was not forwarded to anyone up the chain of command.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:31784-31956 testimony
96
The deputy N2 of Third Fleet Intelligence said the mission report (MISREP) on the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was likely not archived but deleted at some point, as there was no requirement to keep such reports, and it was likely filed with other training mission reports sent in by the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) during deployment preparation.
“Additionally CAPT {{redacted}} stated that it was not likely archived but deleted at some point later as there is no requirement to keep these reports and it was likely in file folder with all of the other training MISREPS sent in by the CSG during deployment preparation.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:31965-32225 testimony
97
The commander of the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) during the intercept of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was Rear Admiral D.C. Curtis, who is now a Vice Admiral and commander of Naval Surface Forces and the Pacific Fleet's Naval Surface Force.
“The commander of the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group during the intercept was Rear Admiral D.C. Curtis now a Vice Admiral (VADM) and is commander of Naval Surface Forces and the Pacific Fleet's Naval Surface Force.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:32278-32482 administrative
98
All of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) activity was reported to D.C. Curtis by the Commanding Officer of USS Princeton (CG-59) and the Commanding Officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 41 (VFA-41).
“All of the AAV activity was reported to VADM Curtis by the Commanding Officer, USS Princeton and Commanding Officer, VFA-41.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:32489-32610 administrative
99
The Director of Operations (N3) for the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) at the time of the intercept confirmed that, other than the mission report (MISREP), there was no other official report or statement from the CSG regarding the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“Capt {{redacted}} was the Director of Operations (N3) for CSG-11 at the time of the intercept. Capt {{redacted}} confirmed that other than the MISREP there was no other official report or statement from the CSG.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:32927-33134 testimony
100
The Director of Operations (N3) for the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) said that at no time did the CSG consider the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) a threat to the battle group.
“He also stated that at no time did they consider the AAV a threat to the battle group.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:33139-33219 testimony
101
The Director of Operations (N3) for the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) said they had no advance knowledge of live fire events, US weapons testing, or any other experimental aircraft operating in the area during the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) encounter.
“Additionally they had no advanced knowledge of live fire events, US Weapons Testing or any other experimental aircraft operating in the area.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:33226-33362 testimony
102
The Director of Operations (N3) for the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) said they had never seen anything like the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) before, and never again.
“Finally, they had never seen anything like this before and never again.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:33368-33433 testimony
103
Peter Daly assumed command of the Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) in January 2005, after the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) intercept, and had no knowledge or involvement in the incident.
“Admiral Peter Daly assumed command of the CSG in January 2005 after the intercept and had no knowledge or involvement in this incident.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:33441-33567 administrative
104
The only participants in the events surrounding the detection and intercept of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) were USS Princeton (CG-59), Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron 117 (VAW-117), Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232), and Strike Fighter Squadron 41 (VFA-41).
“The only participants in the events surrounding the detection and intercept of the AAV are the USS Princeton, VAW-117, VMFA-232, and VFA-41.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:3454-3591 administrative second hand
105
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was observed to descend very rapidly from approximately 18,000 metres down to approximately 15 metres in a matter of seconds.
“The AAVs would descend "very rapidly" from approximately 60,000 feet down to approximately 50 feet in a matter of seconds.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:391-505 observation second hand
106
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) would hover or remain stationary on radar for a short time before departing at high velocities and turn rates.
“They would then hover or stay stationary on the radar for a short time and depart at high velocities and turn rates.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:514-624 observation second hand
107
The Fire Control Officer and his technician aboard USS Princeton (CG-59) initially thought the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) contacts were part of the Composite Training Unit Exercise (COMPTUX).
“The Fire Control Officer, {{redacted: ~2 words}} and his technician, FCSS {{redacted: ~2 words}} initially thought the contacts were part of the COMPTUX exercise.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:6173-6326 observation second hand
108
On 2004-11-14, after again detecting the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), USS Princeton (CG-59) took the opportunity of a flight of two F/A-18Fs returning from a training mission to further investigate the AAV.
“On 14 November after again detecting the AAV, the USS Princeton took the opportunity of having a flight of two F/A-18Fs returning from a training mission to further investigate the AAV.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:631-812 administrative
109
According to a Senior Chief aboard USS Princeton (CG-59), the Anomalous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) would descend from a very high altitude into the scan volume of the AN/SPY-1 radar at high velocity.
“According to Senior Chief {{redacted: ~1 word}} the AAVs would descend from a very high altitude into the scan volume of the AN/SPY-1 at a high velocity.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:6336-6480 observation second hand
110
The top of the AN/SPY-1 scan volume would put the Anomalous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) at higher than approximately 18,000 metres.
“The top of the scan volume would put the AAVs at higher than 60,000 feet.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:6490-6558 measurement
111
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) exhibited turn rates demonstrating an advanced acceleration capability.
“They would then hover for a short time and depart at high velocities and at turn rates demonstrating an advanced acceleration (G) capability.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:6687-6817 observation
112
A Senior Chief aboard USS Princeton (CG-59) with 17 years of experience as a Fire Control operator on Aegis cruisers assessed that the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) exhibited Ballistic Missile Characteristics in reference to its appearance, velocity, and radar indications.
“Senior Chief {{redacted: ~1 word}} added that based on his experience, which is 17 years as a Fire Control on Aegis cruisers, the AAV exhibited Ballistic Missile Characteristics in reference to its appearance, velocity, and indications on the radar.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:6829-7072 opinion second hand
113
Since the AN/SPY-1 radar aboard USS Princeton (CG-59) was set to a mode for Air Intercept of conventional aircraft, it never obtained an accurate track of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicles (AAVs) and quickly dropped the contacts as clutter.
“Since the radar was in the mode to handle Air Intercept of conventional aircraft it never obtained an accurate track of the AAVs and was quickly "dropped" by the radar meaning it was eliminated by the computer to reduce the amount of clutter on the radar, as any other false target is handled.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:7079-7364 observation
114
If the AN/SPY-1 radar aboard USS Princeton (CG-59) had been set up in a mode for Ballistic Missile tracking, it likely would have had the capability to track the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV).
“If the radar were set up in a mode for Ballistic Missile tracking they likely would have had the capability to track the AAV.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:7373-7494 opinion
115
The Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV) was detected by USS Princeton (CG-59) three separate times during the week operating off the western coast of the United States and Mexico.
“They were detected three separate times during the week operating off the western coast of the United States and Mexico.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:7499-7612 observation
116
On 2004-11-14, after again detecting an Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), USS Princeton (CG-59) tasked two F/A-18s airborne in the vicinity for airborne reconnaissance of the AAV.
“On 14 November 2004, after again detecting an AAV took the opportunity of two F/A-18s airborne in the vicinity to task them for airborne reconnaissance of the AAV.”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:7944-8103 administrative
117
USS Princeton (CG-59) took over control of the F/A-18Fs from the E-2C Hawkeye Airborne Early Warning aircraft and vectored them in for an intercept of the Anomalous Aerial Vehicle (AAV), leading to visual contact approximately 1.6 kilometres from the AAV.
“The USS Princeton took over control of the F/A-18s from the E-2C Airborne Early Warning aircraft and vectored in the F/A-18s for intercept leading to visual contact approximately one mile away from the AAV”
Nimitz Carrier Strike Group (CSG-11) AAV Incident Report 2004-11-14 char:817-1019 administrative
118
The mission of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) was to collect and analyse information involving anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV).
“The mission of AATIP was quite simple. It was to collect and analyze information involving anomalous aerial vehicles, what I guess in the vernacular you call them UFOs.”
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs 2021-05-17 00:01:24.1-00:01:33.3 administrative first hand
119
Anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) studied by the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) have been observed reaching 600 to 700 G-forces.
“Imagine a technology that can do 600 to 700 G-forces...”
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs 2021-05-17 00:02:12.6-00:02:16.1 measurement first hand
120
Anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) studied by the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) have been observed flying at approximately 21,000 kilometres per hour.
“that can fly at 13,000 miles an hour”
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs 2021-05-17 00:02:17.0-00:02:18.8 measurement first hand
121
Anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) studied by the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) can evade radar.
“that can evade radar”
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs 2021-05-17 00:02:19.6-00:02:20.9 observation first hand
122
Anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) studied by the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) can fly through air and water, and possibly space.
“that can fly through air and water and possibly space”
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs 2021-05-17 00:02:22.3-00:02:26.0 observation first hand
123
Anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) studied by the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) show no obvious signs of propulsion, wings, or control surfaces.
“has no obvious signs of propulsion, no wings, no control surfaces”
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs 2021-05-17 00:02:27.8-00:02:31.4 observation first hand
124
Anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) studied by the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) appear to defy the natural effects of Earth's gravity.
“still can defy the natural effects of Earth's gravity. That's precisely what we're seeing.”
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs 2021-05-17 00:02:32.4-00:02:36.2 observation first hand
125
For a week before November 14, 2004, the radar on the USS Princeton detected multiple anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) appearing over the horizon.
“For a week, the advanced new radar on a nearby ship, the USS Princeton, had detected what operators called multiple anomalous aerial vehicles over the horizon”
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs 2021-05-17 00:07:23.2-00:07:33.6 observation second hand
126
During the 2004 USS Nimitz UAP encounter, the anomalous aerial vehicles (AAV) detected by the USS Princeton's radar descended approximately 24,000 metres in less than a second.
“descending 80,000 feet in less than a second”
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs 2021-05-17 00:07:34.2-00:07:37.0 measurement second hand
127
In his second resignation letter, Luis Elizondo cites concerns over anomalous aerospace threats as the basis for his resignation.
“Mr. Elizondo cites concerns over anomalous aerospace threats as the basis for his resignation.”
FOIA Response 18-F-0324: AATIP and Luis Elizondo Documents 2022-08-17 char:5729-5811 testimony second hand
128
Holloman Air Force Base borders White Sands Missile Range to the east and has long been speculated to be the scene of Anomalous Aerial Phenomena (AAV) sightings.
“Holloman Air Force Base, also long speculated to be the scene of anomalous craft sightings, borders Wismar to the east.”
Ross Coulthart Q&A: Skywatcher didn't disappear — it went government | Reality Check 2026-08-09 00:16:47.6-00:16:55.1 opinion first hand