Skip to content

Gimbal video

An infrared cockpit video filmed by US Navy fighter pilots off the east coast of the United States showing an unidentified object appearing to rotate mid-flight, released by the US Department of Defense in December 2017.

Late 2014 - early 2015 · Infrared cockpit video, approximately 34 seconds · East coast of the United States · 2017-12-13 · United States Department of Defense

The Gimbal video became world-famous years after being filmed, noted for the object’s unusual flight behaviour.1 It shows a UAP appearing to swivel on its axis in flight, manoeuvring in ways that defied known conventional aircraft capabilities.2 The clip was almost certainly filmed sometime in late 2014 or early 2015 off the east coast of the United States,3 during the period now referred to as the 2014-2015 US East Coast Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) encounters. It was posted on the To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science (TTSA) website alongside an earlier undated infrared clip, the FLIR1 video,4 with TTSA initially disclosing only that the object had been filmed by United States Navy (USN) fighter pilots at an unspecified location.5 Luis Elizondo selected the Go-Fast Video, the Gimbal video and the FLIR1 video - also known as the Tic Tac video - as the three UAP videos he chose to submit for declassification, because their low resolution would hasten the approval process.6 He described the three videos on a single Department of Defense (DoD) Form 1910, the form the United States Department of Defense (DoD) uses to request declassification of documents and multimedia content.7 The Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review officially stamped the form “UNLIMITED DISTRIBUTION”, approving unrestricted public release of all three videos.8 According to In Plain Sight, on 2017-12-13 the DoD released the video, described as authenticated UAP footage, via the TTSA vault website.9

According to Elizondo, when the video was shot the pilots had just encountered a fleet of five UAP in their airspace and locked their camera onto one of the objects, which flew from right to left across the screen.10 In the infrared footage, the object appears elongated and white, indicating it was cold, with no heat emanating from it.11 When the camera mode changed, the object took on a lenticular shape with a bulge on its top and bottom, rendered black to indicate no heat signature.12 Pilots and observers noted a wind blowing at approximately 220 kilometres per hour out of the west and concluded the object was not a drone, since it was flying against that wind, according to Imminent: Inside the Pentagon’s Hunt for UFOs.13 At 120 knots, this wind speed was equivalent to approximately 220 kilometres per hour.14 The object slowed, parked itself in the air, and shifted so that the bulge on top swung from left to right while the bulge on the bottom faced into the wind, at one point flying perpendicular to the wind without bending or tilting.15 It was heatless, wingless, propeller-less and produced no exhaust; it parked itself at an altitude of approximately 6,100 metres and calmly flipped over in winds equivalent to a Category 4 hurricane without fluttering or rattling,16 never losing altitude as it turned through 90 degrees.17 The video shows the object stationary, then apparently rotating through a 90-degree angle while hovering - a manoeuvre described as impossible for any known conventionally powered craft.18

According to In Plain Sight, TTSA’s website stated that the Gimbal object had low observability on both video and radar,19 had no distinguishable flight surfaces,20 no obvious propulsion system,21 and exhibited never-before-seen flight capabilities.22 The same source states that TTSA speculated a strange shimmer on the object’s surface suggested a possible energy or resonance field of unknown nature.23 Like the object filmed during the 2004 USS Nimitz UAP encounter, the Gimbal object had no visible flight surfaces, no visible propulsion, and no heat signature.24 It stayed stationary despite approximately 220 kilometres per hour of wind against it, then suddenly accelerated to speeds well above supersonic,25 and the cluster of objects associated with the video stayed aloft for hours, far beyond the fuel duration of any known conventional craft.26

On a longer version of the video he viewed aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt, Ryan Graves saw a cluster of smaller craft flying in an inverted V-shape in front of the larger object.27 The section of the video that the United States Pentagon publicly released showed only the Gimbal object by itself, with the other objects Graves described left out of frame.28 Graves has said of the object’s 90-degree hover rotation that “it’s just basic airplane physics."29 David Fravor personally knows the pilot who filmed both the Go-Fast Video and the Gimbal video,30 and the two clips were shot by the same person.31 The aircraft involved in filming the Gimbal video were F/A-18F Super Hornet jets equipped with the AN/APG-79 Radar, a phased-array system made by Raytheon.32 Pilots initially thought the associated radar contacts were ghost tracks before confirming a heat signature with a targeting pod.33 The object rotated in place while appearing to move against the wind, without changing aspect the way a turning aircraft would.34 Five other objects were seen flying in a V formation in front of the tracked object, then turned on their radar and flew away while being filmed.35 At least 60 people saw the unidentified objects associated with the Gimbal and Go-Fast videos on radar off the coast near Washington Whidbey Island.36 Lex Fridman has said that the apparent rotation shown in the video is not possible with systems known at the time.37

Elizondo attended a meeting with high-level USN officials, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) representatives and a National Security Agency (NSA) representative, at which the Go-Fast Video and the Gimbal video were shown.38 One attendee joked that the object seemed to be mocking the observers, as if saying “Hey guys, watch this!"39 Elizondo has said that no one in the meeting believed the UAP depicted was made by humans.40 Its behaviour unnerved and mystified the assembled team of aviation and optical experts.41 Elizondo has recounted that a CIA representative at the meeting proposed the object could be a hybrid balloon with an inducted fan at its centre,42 a Mylar football with its own navigation and propulsion,43 or that it might be powered by a tether or beamed energy from a nearby floating platform.44 Elizondo asked the CIA representative about fuel and loiter capability, noting the object was located far out in the middle of the ocean.45 He and his colleagues planned to use both the Go-Fast Video and the Gimbal video to reinforce OPLAN Interloper.46

Joseph Gradisher has stated that the USN has not publicly released characterisations or descriptions, nor released any hypothesis or conclusions, regarding the objects contained in the Tic Tac, Go-Fast and Gimbal videos.47 According to In Plain Sight, the USN has admitted it cannot prosaically explain the Tic Tac craft, the Gimbal video or the Go-Fast video footage taken by its carrier battlegroup fighter pilots.48 The same source states that the Pentagon says the video is real and, officially, unexplained.49 Aside from what has been revealed from the data of the Tic Tac, Gimbal and Go-Fast encounters, there is no publicly documented evidence proving the alleged advanced capabilities described in the ‘Department of Defense (DoD) Threat Scenario’ briefing slide, according to In Plain Sight.50 Elizondo has drawn a comparison between the object’s manoeuvring in the video and the docking manoeuvres of the Apollo Lunar Module approaching the lunar orbiter.51 He has recalled that a bubble surrounding an aircraft, as described in Harold E. Puthoff’s warp theory, was consistent with what was seen in the video.52 Elizondo has said he considers the object’s behaviour consistent with an antigravity device based on the observables shown.53 He has also compared the flight behaviour to an earlier UAP incident in which an object split a formation of fighter aircraft off the coast of Virginia, and has stated that balloons are incapable of such manoeuvres.54 Sceptics have since suggested the object was a balloon, but Elizondo has said he considers this explanation incorrect.55 Eric Davis has said that whatever is propelling the Tic Tac craft, the Go-Fast object and the Gimbal object is, in his assessment, off-world vehicles not made on Earth.56

  1. The Gimbal video became world-famous years after being filmed, noted for the object's unusual flight behaviour.
    “The second film would become world-famous years later by the name GIMBAL. It was slightly more intriguing because of the object’s unusual flight behavior.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:16729-16874 View the source record →
  2. The video shows a UAP swivelling on its axis in flight, manoeuvring beyond known aircraft capabilities.
    “The Gimbal video shows a UAP appearing to swivel on its axis in flight, manoeuvring in ways that defied known conventional aircraft capabilities.”
    In Plain Sight ch21:21407-21539 View the source record →
  3. The video was almost certainly filmed in late 2014 or early 2015 off the US east coast.
    “it would later emerge that the Gimbal was almost certainly videoed sometime in late 2014 or early 2015 off the east coast of the US”
    In Plain Sight ch21:21734-21863 View the source record →
  4. It was posted on the TTSA website alongside the FLIR1 video.
    “That FLIR1/Tic Tac film was posted on the TTSA site along with another undated 34-second video known as the 'Gimbal'.”
    In Plain Sight ch21:21287-21396 View the source record →
  5. TTSA initially disclosed only that it was filmed by US Navy fighter pilots at an unspecified location.
    “TTSA initially revealed very little about the Gimbal object other than that it was seen and videoed by US Navy fighter pilots at an unspecified location”
    In Plain Sight ch21:21553-21724 View the source record →
  6. Elizondo chose the Go-Fast, Gimbal and FLIR1 videos for declassification because their low resolution would hasten approval.
    “I anticipated that their low resolution would be an asset and hasten the approval process. I chose the FLIR video (aka Tic Tac from 2004), and the GoFast and GIMBAL videos from 2015.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch27:3984-4161 View the source record →
  7. He described the three videos on a single DoD Form 1910.
    “I described all three videos on a single Form 1910, which the DoD uses to request declassification of everything from documents to multimedia content.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch27:4167-4309 View the source record →
  8. The Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review stamped the form 'UNLIMITED DISTRIBUTION'.
    “Shortly after, the approval showed up in my inbox. DoDOPSR had officially stamped my Form 1910 with the following words: UNLIMITED DISTRIBUTION.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch27:5617-5748 View the source record →
  9. The DoD released the video via the TTSA vault website on 2017-12-13.
    “US Dept of Defence, 'Gimbal: Authenticated UAP Video', 13 December 2017, TheVaulttothestarsacademy.com.”
    In Plain Sight ch34:44333-44432 View the source record →
  10. Pilots had encountered a fleet of five UAP and locked their camera onto one object.
    “When the film was shot, the pilots had just encountered a fleet of five UAP in their airspace. They managed to lock the camera on just one of these objects and watched as it flew from right to left of the screen.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:16884-17089 View the source record →
  11. The object appears elongated, white and cold in the infrared footage.
    “In the video, the object looks elongated and white. But that color is somewhat misleading. Since the camera is in infrared mode, white merely indicates that the object is 'cold'—no heat emanating from the aircraft at all.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:17098-17315 View the source record →
  12. A camera mode change shows a lenticular shape rendered black, indicating cold.
    “Staring them in the face is what looks like a stereotypical flying saucer out of some 1950s-era movie. The object is lenticular, with a bulge on its top and bottom. The object is now black, which in this camera mode also indicates that the object is 'cold'—no heat signature.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:17933-18198 View the source record →
  13. Wind of approximately 220 km/h from the west; the object was concluded not to be a drone.
    “"It’s a f—in’ drone, bro," someone says. "Look, there’s a whole fleet of them! Look on the [radar]." ... "It’s damn sure not a drone," someone else responds. "They’re all going against the wind! The wind is 120 knots out of the west."”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:17464-17729 View the source record →
  14. 120 knots is equivalent to approximately 220 km/h.
    “At 120 knots, the wind speed the pilots clocked is equivalent to 138-mile-per-hour winds.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:18866-18949 View the source record →
  15. Object parked itself, shifted its bulges, and flew perpendicular to the wind without bending.
    “Then the UAP slows, parks itself in the air, and begins to shift. The bulge on top swings from left to right, and now the bulge on its bottom faces the wind. At one point the object flies perpendicular to the oncoming wind, yet it doesn’t bend or tilt from the resistance.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:18326-18587 View the source record →
  16. Heatless, wingless, no exhaust, parked at approximately 6,100 metres, flipped in hurricane-force winds without fluttering.
    “Yet this object—which is heatless, wingless, and propeller-less, and spews no exhaust—parks itself at 20,000 feet in the sky and calmly flips itself over in winds that would be classified as a Category 4 hurricane on earth. It doesn’t even flutter or rattle like a kite.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:19150-19415 View the source record →
  17. The object never lost altitude as it turned 90 degrees.
    “What made GIMBAL so perplexing was the fact the object never lost altitude as it turned 90 degrees.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:21909-22000 View the source record →
  18. In the video, the object rotates through a 90-degree angle while hovering.
    “At one point, the Gimbal was stationary and then it apparently rotated through a 90-degree angle in the hover, a manoeuvre that is impossible for any known conventionally powered craft.”
    In Plain Sight ch22:5024-5203 View the source record →
  19. TTSA's website stated the object had low observability on video and radar.
    “The TTSA website said the Gimbal had 'low-observability' on both video and radar”
    In Plain Sight ch21:21868-21943 View the source record →
  20. No distinguishable flight surfaces.
    “it also had no distinguishable flight surfaces, no 'obvious propulsion system', 'never-before-seen flight capabilities'”
    In Plain Sight ch21:21950-22056 View the source record →
  21. No obvious propulsion system.
    “no 'obvious propulsion system'”
    In Plain Sight ch21:21998-22021 View the source record →
  22. Never-before-seen flight capabilities.
    “'never-before-seen flight capabilities'”
    In Plain Sight ch21:22031-22056 View the source record →
  23. TTSA speculated that a shimmer suggested a possible energy or resonance field.
    “because of a strange shimmer on its surface, they speculated that it had a 'possible energy or resonance field of unknown nature'”
    In Plain Sight ch21:22075-22197 View the source record →
  24. Like the Nimitz object, no visible flight surfaces, propulsion, or heat signature.
    “Just like the 2004 Tic Tac, the Gimbal had no visible flight surfaces, no visible propulsion, and no heat signature.”
    In Plain Sight ch22:5565-5671 View the source record →
  25. Stayed stationary against ~220 km/h wind, then accelerated well above supersonic.
    “It stayed stationary in one spot, even though there were 120 knots of wind against it, then it suddenly accelerated well above supersonic speeds.”
    In Plain Sight ch22:5682-5820 View the source record →
  26. The cluster stayed aloft for hours, beyond conventional fuel duration.
    “Even stranger, the cluster of objects it was part of stayed aloft for hours, far beyond the fuel duration of any known conventional craft.”
    In Plain Sight ch22:5828-5960 View the source record →
  27. Graves saw a cluster in inverted V-shape on a longer version viewed aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt.
    “What he saw on the onboard video was a cluster of smaller craft flying in an inverted V-shape in front of the larger Gimbal object.”
    In Plain Sight ch22:4760-4884 View the source record →
  28. The publicly released section showed only the single object, cropped from the wider footage.
    “The section of video publicly released by the Pentagon only showed the Gimbal by itself; the other objects were out of the picture.”
    In Plain Sight ch22:4892-5015 View the source record →
  29. Graves: 'It's just basic airplane physics.'
    “‘It’s just basic airplane physics,’ Graves explained.”
    In Plain Sight ch22:5211-5253 View the source record →
  30. Fravor personally knows the pilot who filmed both videos.
    “No, because what Mick West doesn't see is so when they take, because I've talked to the one of them actually I work with, so I know him, I know I talk to him all the time.”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:44:31.0-02:44:39.7
  31. Both videos were shot by the same person.
    “The go fast and the gimbal were shot by the same person, okay?”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:44:47.9-02:44:50.0
  32. Aircraft were F/A-18F Super Hornets with AN/APG-79 radar made by Raytheon.
    “the airplanes they're flying, still Super Hornets, but they have the APG-79, which is the new phased array radar that's made by Raytheon”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:44:59.2-02:45:05.2
  33. Contacts initially thought ghost tracks before a heat signature was confirmed.
    “So at first they thought they were ghost tracks when they started seeing stuff, and then they actually threw one of the targeting pods out there.”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:45:11.4-02:45:15.8
  34. Object rotated in place without changing aspect like a turning aircraft.
    “This thing doesn't change aspect, it just rotates. It's just rotating.”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:45:37.4-02:45:39.2
  35. Five objects in a V formation turned on radar and flew away.
    “There's five other, I think it's five, they're kind of in a V, you know, like a geese would fly that are out in front of it and they're actually coming, they're out in front of it and they actually turn on the radar and go the other way while they're filming the gimbal video.”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:45:56.3-02:46:07.9
  36. At least 60 people saw the objects on radar near Whidbey Island.
    “there's at least 60 people that have seen these things on radar off the vacates”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:46:24.1-02:46:28.2
  37. Fridman: the rotation is not possible with systems known at the time.
    “the gimbal video to comment on the amazing aspect of that video is the rotation, the apparent rotation of the object that is something that is not possible to do with systems that we know of”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:44:05.9-02:44:21.9
  38. Elizondo attended a meeting with USN, CIA and NSA officials where the videos were shown.
    “A few months later I was sitting in a room with high-level Navy officials, CIA reps, and someone from the NSA... we rolled the tapes.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:21631-21748 View the source record →
  39. An attendee joked the object seemed to be mocking observers.
    “One of our meeting attendees made an uncomfortable joke that this thing seemed to be showing us what it could do, mocking us, as if to say, "Hey guys, watch this!"”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:22403-22560 View the source record →
  40. No one in the meeting believed the object was made by humans.
    “To be clear, no one in that room thought this UAP was made by humans.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:22788-22850 View the source record →
  41. The behaviour unnerved and mystified the experts present.
    “This unnerved, mystified, and concerned our team of aviation and optical experts.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:22859-22932 View the source record →
  42. A CIA representative proposed a hybrid balloon with an inducted fan.
    “"The only way I see this being even remotely possible is if you had a... hybrid balloon with some sort of inducted fan at its center," he said, not quite believing his own words.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:24494-24663 View the source record →
  43. A CIA representative suggested a Mylar football with its own navigation and propulsion.
    “"Perhaps it is some sort of Mylar football that has its own navigation and propulsion."”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:24671-24745 View the source record →
  44. A CIA representative suggested a tether or beamed energy from a floating platform.
    “"Um... perhaps they are using some sort of tether or beamed energy to give it power, you know? Like a floating platform nearby."”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:25108-25225 View the source record →
  45. Elizondo asked about fuel and loiter capability given the mid-ocean location.
    “"What about fuel and loiter capability? This thing is way out in the middle of nowhere," I said.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:24974-25064 View the source record →
  46. The videos were planned to reinforce OPLAN Interloper.
    “hesitation we knew we would use both videos to reinforce OPLAN Interloper.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:19980-20043 View the source record →
  47. Gradisher: the Navy has not released characterisations or conclusions on the videos.
    “‘The Navy has not publicly released characterizations or descriptions, nor released any hypothesis or conclusions, in regard to the objects contained in the referenced videos.’”
    In Plain Sight ch22:10667-10834 View the source record →
  48. The Navy admits it cannot prosaically explain the footage.
    “it might explain why the US Navy recently admitted that it cannot prosaically explain the Tic-Tac, Gimbal or Go-Fast videos taken by its carrier battlegroup fighter pilots.”
    In Plain Sight ch27:25269-25434 View the source record →
  49. The Pentagon says the video is real and officially unexplained.
    “The Pentagon says the video is real and, officially, unexplained.”
    In Plain Sight ch37:8537-8590 View the source record →
  50. No public evidence proves the capabilities in the DoD briefing slide beyond the three encounters.
    “It should be emphasised that there is not a shred of evidence on the public record to show that any of these capabilities have been proven, other than what has been revealed publicly and privately by the data from the Tic Tac, Gimbal and Go Fast encounters.”
    In Plain Sight ch25:21027-21273 View the source record →
  51. Elizondo compared the manoeuvring to the Apollo Lunar Module's docking approach to the lunar orbiter.
    “The GIMBAL maneuvered in a way that reminded me of the old Apollo 11 lunar module... If you compare that maneuver to the way in which the object in the GIMBAL video rotates, you will see an uncanny resemblance.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs 00:00:13.0-00:00:15.0 View the source record →
  52. A bubble effect was recalled as consistent with Puthoff's warp theory.
    “I remembered that a bubble around an aircraft was exactly what we’d seen in the GIMBAL video… and others.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch24:6282-6382 View the source record →
  53. Elizondo: behaviour consistent with an antigravity device.
    “On the observables scale, it was clearly an antigravity device.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:25554-25610 View the source record →
  54. Compared to the Virginia formation-splitting incident; balloons incapable of such manoeuvres.
    “This again reminded me of the previous investigation of "balloons" splitting the formation of fighter aircraft off the coast of Virginia. Balloons can’t do that.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:19421-19577 View the source record →
  55. Elizondo rejects the later balloon explanation.
    “Skeptics would later suggest that the object was a balloon, but this was certainly not the case.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs ch23:22305-22396 View the source record →
  56. Davis: the propulsion is off-world vehicles not made on Earth.
    “Dr Davis leaves no room for doubt when he says whatever is propelling the Tic Tac, Go Fast and Gimbal UAPs is 'off-world vehicles not made on this earth'”
    In Plain Sight ch28:27597-27744 View the source record →

Language

30 languages covering 80% of the world's literate population

English English English (US) English (US) Spanish Español Portuguese Português Indonesian Bahasa Indonesia French Français Swahili Kiswahili Vietnamese Tiếng Việt Turkish Türkçe German Deutsch Italian Italiano Uzbek Oʻzbekcha Polish Polski Tagalog Tagalog
Mandarin 中文 Traditional Chinese 繁體中文 Japanese 日本語 Korean 한국어
Arabic العربية Urdu اردو Persian فارسی
Russian Русский Ukrainian Українська
Hindi हिन्दी Bengali বাংলা Thai ไทย Burmese မြန်မာ Telugu తెలుగు Marathi मराठी Tamil தமிழ்