Skip to content

Gimbal Video

A declassified US Navy infrared video recording, filmed circa 2014–2015, depicting an unidentified aerial object exhibiting anomalous flight characteristics off the eastern seaboard of the United States.

circa 2014–2015 · 34 seconds (publicly released version) · Eastern seaboard of the United States · Officially unidentified; publicly released · Declassified military video recording

The Gimbal video is a declassified US Navy infrared recording, almost certainly captured in late 2014 or early 2015 off the eastern seaboard of the United States.1 The footage was recorded during the period of the 2015 Atlantic Coast UAP Sightings involving naval aviators deployed aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt.4 In the video, a UAP is depicted appearing to swivel on its axis in flight; To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science (TTSA), which first published the footage publicly, described the object as exhibiting low-observability on both video and radar, no distinguishable flight surfaces, no obvious propulsion system, and a possible energy or resonance field of unknown nature.2 The publicly released version runs 34 seconds.3

The chain of declassification and public release begins with Luis Elizondo, who selected the Gimbal footage alongside the FLIR1 Video and the Go-Fast Video as unclassified material suitable for sharing with outside partners.5 He documented all three on a single DoD Form 1910, the standard instrument by which the Department of Defense (DoD) processes requests for declassification of documents and multimedia content.6 Upon resigning from the Pentagon in 2017, Elizondo had obtained declassification of the three videos.7 Christopher K. Mellon, drawing on his long service in the intelligence community, subsequently acquired copies of the recordings and passed them to The New York Times.8 The 2017 New York Times story included links to both the FLIR (Tic Tac) video and the Gimbal video, hosted on TTSA’s YouTube page; the Go-Fast Video followed some months later.9 This sequence of events formed part of the 2017 NYT Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) Story Publication.

When examined through its infrared imaging system — an Advanced Airborne Forward-Looking Infrared (ATFLIR) pod — the object initially appeared white, indicating no detectable heat emanation.11 After the weapons systems operator switched camera modes, the image resolved to reveal a lenticular form with a bulge on both its top and bottom surfaces; in this mode the object appeared black, again consistent with an absence of a heat signature.10 The object subsequently slowed, halted its forward motion, and began to rotate, with the upper bulge swinging from left to right.12 David Fravor, though not the pilot who recorded the footage, confirmed through personal acquaintance with that individual that the object rotated whilst remaining stationary against winds of approximately 70 knots, and that it did not change aspect as a turning aircraft would — it simply rotated.18 Independent accounts place the wind speed at 120 knots (approximately 222 kilometres per hour), equivalent in force to a Category 4 hurricane, conditions against which the object flew perpendicularly without any apparent deflection.15,16,17 The object maintained its altitude of approximately 6,100 metres (20,000 feet) throughout the rotation and did not lose height as it turned 90 degrees.14

A notable feature reported by witnesses is that the publicly released 34-second clip represents only a portion of the full encounter. Ryan Graves testified to both The New York Times and the History Channel that a much longer, higher-resolution version existed, which he had viewed aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt.22 That longer recording reportedly included a cluster of smaller craft flying in an inverted V-shape ahead of the primary Gimbal object — a portion absent from the publicly released footage.20 This account is corroborated by David Fravor, who noted that approximately five additional objects were visible on radar in a V-formation ahead of the primary object during the filmed encounter.19 At the 2023 House Oversight Subcommittee UAP hearing, Ryan Graves stated that during the Gimbal incident the pilots referred to a fleet of objects not visible on the forward-looking infrared system itself, and that he had observed this fleet on radar data during the subsequent debrief.21

The GIMBAL Object Aura — a halo-like feature visible around the object in the footage — was subject to internal government discussion. Elizondo convened a meeting attended by high-level Navy officials, representatives of the CIA, and a National Security Agency representative, at which the video was screened.23 According to Elizondo, no attendee at that meeting concluded the object had been manufactured by humans.24 A CIA representative present confirmed that the aura was not a camera artefact or lens flare but a real phenomenon,25 whilst separately proposing conventional explanations such as a hybrid balloon with an inducted fan, or a Mylar balloon with its own navigation and propulsion fed by a nearby platform.26 Mick West has publicly suggested that flare-like reflections or similar optical phenomena could account for the apparent rotation visible in the footage.30 Elizondo and his colleague Jay Stratton also intended to employ the Gimbal and Go-Fast Video footage to support the case for OPLAN Interloper.29

The Pentagon issued a statement on 2020-04-27 concerning the release of historical Navy UAP videos.28 Prior to that formal release, in September 2019, Navy spokesman Joseph Gradisher had informed the Black Vault website that the Navy regards the phenomena depicted in the three UAP videos — including the Gimbal footage — as unidentified.27 The Pentagon UAP Video Release 2020 constituted the DoD’s formal public acknowledgement of the recordings. The Gimbal video is officially attributed as courtesy of the Department of Defense (DoD) and remains, as of the date of publication, without an official explanation.

  1. The Gimbal video was almost certainly filmed in late 2014 or early 2015 off the east coast of the US.
    “it would later emerge that the Gimbal was almost certainly videoed sometime in late 2014 or early 2015 off the east coast of the US”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 Chapter 16, paragraph 19
  2. The Gimbal video shows a UAP appearing to swivel on its axis in flight; TTSA described it as having low-observability, no distinguishable flight surfaces, no obvious propulsion system, and a possible energy or resonance field.
    “The Gimbal video shows a UAP appearing to swivel on its axis in flight, manoeuvring in ways that defied known conventional aircraft capabilities. TTSA initially revealed very little about the Gimbal object other than that it was seen and videoed by US Navy fighter pilots at an unspecified location... The TTSA website said the Gimbal had 'low-observability' on both video and radar; it also had no distinguishable flight surfaces, no 'obvious propulsion system', 'never-before-seen flight capabilities' and, because of a strange shimmer on its surface, they speculated that it had a 'possible energy or resonance field of unknown nature'.”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 Chapter 16, paragraph 19
  3. TTSA posted a 34-second Gimbal video on its website in mid-December 2017.
    “One of those videos was the 76-second so-called FLIR1 video, depicting the Tic Tac, the egg- or oblong-shaped UAP filmed by the USS Nimitz pilot in 2004. That FLIR1/Tic Tac film was posted on the TTSA site along with another undated 34-second video known as the 'Gimbal'.”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 Chapter 16, paragraph 19
  4. The Gimbal video shows a 2014 or 2015 encounter recorded by a navy fighter jet from the USS Theodore Roosevelt off the eastern seaboard near Florida; the Pentagon states the video is real and officially unexplained.
    “A still of the so-called 'Gimbal' UAP, from the official US Navy video of a 2014 or 2015 encounter. This video was taken by a navy fighter jet from the nuclear aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt, off the eastern seaboard, near the Florida coast. The Pentagon says the video is real and, officially, unexplained.”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 Photo Section caption 27
  5. Luis Elizondo selected the FLIR, GoFast, and GIMBAL videos as three unclassified videos to share with outside partners.
    “I chose the FLIR video (aka Tic Tac from 2004), and the GoFast and GIMBAL videos from 2015.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 19, paragraph 8
  6. Luis Elizondo described all three selected videos on a single DoD Form 1910, requesting declassification.
    “I described all three videos on a single Form 1910, which the DoD uses to request declassification of everything from documents to multimedia content.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 19, paragraph 9
  7. Frustrated with internal resistance, Elizondo resigned from the Pentagon in 2017, but before doing so obtained declassification of three UAP videos.
    “until finally, frustrated, he quit the Pentagon in 2017, but not before getting these three videos declassified”
    Navy Pilots Describe Encounters with UFOs (60 Minutes) 00:10:39.5
  8. In 2017, Christopher Mellon surreptitiously acquired the three Navy UAP videos that Elizondo had declassified and leaked them to The New York Times.
    “In 2017, as a private citizen, he surreptitiously acquired the three Navy videos Elizondo had declassified and leaked them to The New York Times.”
    Navy Pilots Describe Encounters with UFOs (60 Minutes) 00:11:18.7
  9. The online New York Times story included links to the FLIR (Tic Tac) video and the Gimbal video posted on To the Stars Academy's YouTube page.
    “The online story also included links to two of the unclassified UAP videos, which were posted on TTSA's YouTube page: the FLIR (aka Tic Tac) video and the GIMBAL video. (They released the GoFast video some months later.)”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 21, NYT articles paragraph
  10. After switching camera mode, the image revealed a lenticular object with a bulge on its top and bottom, appearing black in that mode, indicating no heat signature.
    “Staring them in the face is what looks like a stereotypical flying saucer out of some 1950s-era movie. The object is lenticular, with a bulge on its top and bottom. The object is now black, which in this camera mode also indicates that the object is 'cold'—no heat signature.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 26
  11. In the GIMBAL video the object appeared white in infrared mode, indicating no heat emanating from it.
    “Since the camera is in infrared mode, white merely indicates that the object is 'cold'—no heat emanating from the aircraft at all.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 24
  12. The GIMBAL UAP slowed, parked itself in the air, and began to rotate — the bulge on top swinging from left to right.
    “the UAP slows, parks itself in the air, and begins to shift. The bulge on top swings from left to right, and now the bulge on its bottom faces the wind.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 26
  13. The Gimbal UAP was observed to rotate through a 90-degree angle while stationary in a hover, a manoeuvre impossible for any known conventionally powered craft.
    “At one point, the Gimbal was stationary and then it apparently rotated through a 90-degree angle in the hover, a manoeuvre that is impossible for any known conventionally powered craft.”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 paragraph 3
  14. The object appeared to hover at approximately 6,100 metres (20,000 feet) and did not lose altitude as it turned 90 degrees.
    “What made GIMBAL so perplexing was the fact the object never lost altitude as it turned 90 degrees… the object seemed to hover at an altitude of 20,000 feet and linger there, eerily.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 31
  15. The pilots noted the UAP were 'all going against the wind' and that 'the wind is 120 knots out of the west'.
    “They're all going against the wind! The wind is 120 knots out of the west.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 25
  16. The GIMBAL UAP flew perpendicular to the oncoming wind without bending or tilting, appearing impervious to the atmosphere.
    “At one point the object flies perpendicular to the oncoming wind, yet it doesn't bend or tilt from the resistance. It's impervious to the atmosphere.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 26
  17. The Gimbal UAP had no visible flight surfaces, no visible propulsion, and no heat signature.
    “Just like the 2004 Tic Tac, the Gimbal had no visible flight surfaces, no visible propulsion, and no heat signature.”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 paragraph 3
  18. David Fravor stated that in the Gimbal video the object is rotating while remaining stationary against a 70-knot wind, and does not change aspect as a turning aircraft would.
    “it's just sitting there and it's in the wind and it's going against the wind while it's doing this... if an airplane does this, it's eventually going to start to change aspect because it's in a turn. This thing doesn't change aspect, it just rotates.”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:45:27
  19. Fravor stated there were approximately five other objects visible on radar arranged in a V-formation in front of the primary object.
    “There's five other, I think it's five, they're kind of in a V, you know, like a geese would fly that are out in front of it and they're actually coming, they're out in front of it and they actually turn on the radar and go the other way while they're filming the gimbal video.”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:46:00
  20. Ryan Graves said the on-board video on the Roosevelt showed a cluster of smaller craft flying in an inverted V-shape in front of the larger Gimbal object, a portion not included in the publicly released video.
    “What he saw on the onboard video was a cluster of smaller craft flying in an inverted V-shape in front of the larger Gimbal object. The section of video publicly released by the Pentagon only showed the Gimbal by itself; the other objects were out of the picture.”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 paragraph 3
  21. During the Gimbal incident, the pilots refer to a fleet of objects not visible on the FLIR system; Graves witnessed this fleet on the radar data situational awareness page during the debrief.
    “The recording on the AT FLIR system shows a single object that rotates. You hear the pilots refer to a fleet of objects that is not visible on the FLIR system and that was something that I witnessed during the debrief as part of the radar data on the situational awareness page.”
    House Oversight Subcommittee UAP Hearing – 26 July 2023 printed_page 39
  22. Ryan Graves told The New York Times and the History Channel that the publicly released Gimbal video was part of a much longer, higher-resolution video he viewed on board the USS Theodore Roosevelt.
    “Graves told both the TV documentary and The New York Times that the publicly released Gimbal video was part of a much longer, higherresolution video he viewed on board the Roosevelt.”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 paragraph 3
  23. Elizondo held a meeting with high-level Navy officials, CIA representatives, and a National Security Agency representative at which the GIMBAL video was screened.
    “A few months later I was sitting in a room with high-level Navy officials, CIA reps, and someone from the NSA. After the usual exchange of pleasantries and some backslapping, we rolled the tapes.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 31
  24. No one in the room believed the UAP was made by humans.
    “To be clear, no one in that room thought this UAP was made by humans.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 32
  25. A CIA representative confirmed the aura visible around the GIMBAL object was not a camera artefact or lens flare — it was real.
    “According to the CIA, it was not. It was not an artifact of the camera nor a lens flare. Whatever it was, it was real.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 36
  26. A CIA representative suggested the object might be a hybrid balloon with an inducted fan or a Mylar football with navigation and propulsion.
    “'The only way I see this being even remotely possible is if you had a… hybrid balloon with some sort of inducted fan at its center… Perhaps it is some sort of Mylar football that has its own navigation and propulsion.'… 'Um… perhaps they are using some sort of tether or beamed energy to give it power, you know? Like a floating platform nearby.'”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraphs 33-34
  27. In September 2019, Navy spokesman Joseph Gradisher told The Black Vault that the Navy considers the phenomena in the three UAP videos as unidentified.
    “'The Navy considers the phenomena contained/depicted in those three videos [the Tic-Tac, The Go-Fast and the Gimbal UAPs] as unidentified,' a navy spokesman Joseph Gradisher told John Greenewald's The Black Vault website.”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 paragraph 8
  28. The DoD released a statement on 27 April 2020 regarding the release of historical Navy UAP videos.
    “US DoD statement, 'Statement by the Department of Defence on the Release of Historical Navy Videos', 27 April 2020.”
    Ross Coulthart UAP Book - Prologue, Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 Chapter 17, endnote 21
  29. Elizondo and Jay Stratton intended to use the GIMBAL and GoFast videos to reinforce the case for OPLAN Interloper.
    “Without hesitation we knew we would use both videos to reinforce OPLAN Interloper.”
    Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs — Chapter 2 (image only) Chapter 15, paragraph 31
  30. Lex Fridman noted the apparent rotation of the object in the Gimbal video is something not possible with known systems, and that Mick West suggested flare-like reflections could explain it.
    “the gimbal video to comment on the amazing aspect of that video is the rotation, the apparent rotation of the object that is something that is not possible to do with systems that we know of. And Mick West suggests that a flare like reflections or whatever can explain.”
    David Fravor: UFOs, Aliens, Fighter Jets, and Aerospace Engineering | Lex Fridman Podcast #122 02:44:05

Language

30 languages covering 77% of the world's literate population

English English English (US) English (US) Spanish Español Portuguese Português Indonesian Bahasa Indonesia French Français Swahili Kiswahili Vietnamese Tiếng Việt Turkish Türkçe German Deutsch Italian Italiano Uzbek Oʻzbekcha Polish Polski Tagalog Tagalog
Mandarin 中文 Traditional Chinese 繁體中文 Japanese 日本語 Korean 한국어
Arabic العربية Urdu اردو Persian فارسی
Russian Русский Ukrainian Українська
Hindi हिन्दी Bengali বাংলা Thai ไทย Burmese မြန်မာ Telugu తెలుగు Marathi मराठी Tamil தமிழ்