The Gimbal video became world-famous years after being filmed, noted for the object’s unusual flight behaviour.1 It shows a UAP appearing to swivel on its axis in flight, manoeuvring in ways that defied known conventional aircraft capabilities.2 The clip was almost certainly filmed sometime in late 2014 or early 2015 off the east coast of the United States,3 during the period now referred to as the 2014-2015 US East Coast Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) encounters. It was posted on the To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science (TTSA) website alongside an earlier undated infrared clip, the FLIR1 video,4 with TTSA initially disclosing only that the object had been filmed by United States Navy (USN) fighter pilots at an unspecified location.5 Luis Elizondo selected the Go-Fast Video, the Gimbal video and the FLIR1 video - also known as the Tic Tac video - as the three UAP videos he chose to submit for declassification, because their low resolution would hasten the approval process.6 He described the three videos on a single Department of Defense (DoD) Form 1910, the form the United States Department of Defense (DoD) uses to request declassification of documents and multimedia content.7 The Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review officially stamped the form “UNLIMITED DISTRIBUTION”, approving unrestricted public release of all three videos.8 According to In Plain Sight, on 2017-12-13 the DoD released the video, described as authenticated UAP footage, via the TTSA vault website.9
According to Elizondo, when the video was shot the pilots had just encountered a fleet of five UAP in their airspace and locked their camera onto one of the objects, which flew from right to left across the screen.10 In the infrared footage, the object appears elongated and white, indicating it was cold, with no heat emanating from it.11 When the camera mode changed, the object took on a lenticular shape with a bulge on its top and bottom, rendered black to indicate no heat signature.12 Pilots and observers noted a wind blowing at approximately 220 kilometres per hour out of the west and concluded the object was not a drone, since it was flying against that wind, according to Imminent: Inside the Pentagon’s Hunt for UFOs.13 At 120 knots, this wind speed was equivalent to approximately 220 kilometres per hour.14 The object slowed, parked itself in the air, and shifted so that the bulge on top swung from left to right while the bulge on the bottom faced into the wind, at one point flying perpendicular to the wind without bending or tilting.15 It was heatless, wingless, propeller-less and produced no exhaust; it parked itself at an altitude of approximately 6,100 metres and calmly flipped over in winds equivalent to a Category 4 hurricane without fluttering or rattling,16 never losing altitude as it turned through 90 degrees.17 The video shows the object stationary, then apparently rotating through a 90-degree angle while hovering - a manoeuvre described as impossible for any known conventionally powered craft.18
According to In Plain Sight, TTSA’s website stated that the Gimbal object had low observability on both video and radar,19 had no distinguishable flight surfaces,20 no obvious propulsion system,21 and exhibited never-before-seen flight capabilities.22 The same source states that TTSA speculated a strange shimmer on the object’s surface suggested a possible energy or resonance field of unknown nature.23 Like the object filmed during the 2004 USS Nimitz UAP encounter, the Gimbal object had no visible flight surfaces, no visible propulsion, and no heat signature.24 It stayed stationary despite approximately 220 kilometres per hour of wind against it, then suddenly accelerated to speeds well above supersonic,25 and the cluster of objects associated with the video stayed aloft for hours, far beyond the fuel duration of any known conventional craft.26
On a longer version of the video he viewed aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt, Ryan Graves saw a cluster of smaller craft flying in an inverted V-shape in front of the larger object.27 The section of the video that the United States Pentagon publicly released showed only the Gimbal object by itself, with the other objects Graves described left out of frame.28 Graves has said of the object’s 90-degree hover rotation that “it’s just basic airplane physics."29 David Fravor personally knows the pilot who filmed both the Go-Fast Video and the Gimbal video,30 and the two clips were shot by the same person.31 The aircraft involved in filming the Gimbal video were F/A-18F Super Hornet jets equipped with the AN/APG-79 Radar, a phased-array system made by Raytheon.32 Pilots initially thought the associated radar contacts were ghost tracks before confirming a heat signature with a targeting pod.33 The object rotated in place while appearing to move against the wind, without changing aspect the way a turning aircraft would.34 Five other objects were seen flying in a V formation in front of the tracked object, then turned on their radar and flew away while being filmed.35 At least 60 people saw the unidentified objects associated with the Gimbal and Go-Fast videos on radar off the coast near Washington Whidbey Island.36 Lex Fridman has said that the apparent rotation shown in the video is not possible with systems known at the time.37
Elizondo attended a meeting with high-level USN officials, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) representatives and a National Security Agency (NSA) representative, at which the Go-Fast Video and the Gimbal video were shown.38 One attendee joked that the object seemed to be mocking the observers, as if saying “Hey guys, watch this!"39 Elizondo has said that no one in the meeting believed the UAP depicted was made by humans.40 Its behaviour unnerved and mystified the assembled team of aviation and optical experts.41 Elizondo has recounted that a CIA representative at the meeting proposed the object could be a hybrid balloon with an inducted fan at its centre,42 a Mylar football with its own navigation and propulsion,43 or that it might be powered by a tether or beamed energy from a nearby floating platform.44 Elizondo asked the CIA representative about fuel and loiter capability, noting the object was located far out in the middle of the ocean.45 He and his colleagues planned to use both the Go-Fast Video and the Gimbal video to reinforce OPLAN Interloper.46
Joseph Gradisher has stated that the USN has not publicly released characterisations or descriptions, nor released any hypothesis or conclusions, regarding the objects contained in the Tic Tac, Go-Fast and Gimbal videos.47 According to In Plain Sight, the USN has admitted it cannot prosaically explain the Tic Tac craft, the Gimbal video or the Go-Fast video footage taken by its carrier battlegroup fighter pilots.48 The same source states that the Pentagon says the video is real and, officially, unexplained.49 Aside from what has been revealed from the data of the Tic Tac, Gimbal and Go-Fast encounters, there is no publicly documented evidence proving the alleged advanced capabilities described in the ‘Department of Defense (DoD) Threat Scenario’ briefing slide, according to In Plain Sight.50 Elizondo has drawn a comparison between the object’s manoeuvring in the video and the docking manoeuvres of the Apollo Lunar Module approaching the lunar orbiter.51 He has recalled that a bubble surrounding an aircraft, as described in Harold E. Puthoff’s warp theory, was consistent with what was seen in the video.52 Elizondo has said he considers the object’s behaviour consistent with an antigravity device based on the observables shown.53 He has also compared the flight behaviour to an earlier UAP incident in which an object split a formation of fighter aircraft off the coast of Virginia, and has stated that balloons are incapable of such manoeuvres.54 Sceptics have since suggested the object was a balloon, but Elizondo has said he considers this explanation incorrect.55 Eric Davis has said that whatever is propelling the Tic Tac craft, the Go-Fast object and the Gimbal object is, in his assessment, off-world vehicles not made on Earth.56