JPL began in the 1920s as an aerodynamics testing facility under Caltech in Pasadena.
“What eventually became NASA's "Jet Propulsion Laboratory"... actually began in the 1920s as an aerodynamics testing facility, under the fledgling "California Institute of Technology" in Pasadena.”
Dark Mission
ch12:73259-73480
By the mid-1930s Jack Parsons and associates were testing home-made rockets in Devil's Canyon, where JPL now sits.
“By the mid-1930s, Parsons and his pals were testing their small "home-made rockets" in an area of Pasadena called "Devil's Canyon"; today, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory sits on that very land.”
Dark Mission
ch12:76126-76313
JPL was founded on Halloween 1936 at a rocket test in Arroyo Seco, credited primarily to Theodore von Karman.
“He was primarily responsible for the creation of "JPL" (literally, on Halloween 1936, no less) at a rocket test in the Arroyo Seca area of the Devil's Canyon.”
Dark Mission
ch12:78821-78974
JPL still marks the 1936 Halloween rocket test as its birthplace with an annual nativity-scene re-enactment.
“JPL still refers to this test as the "birthplace" of the Laboratory, and even trots out what they call a "nativity scene" every Halloween to celebrate the event [Fig. 5-21].”
Dark Mission
ch12:78982-79151
By January 1945 GALCIT had become the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
“By the time GALCIT became "JPL," in January 1945, Parsons' professional reputation had been sealed”
Dark Mission
ch12:90392-90484
No jet engine was ever tested or produced at JPL; it was always strictly a rocket laboratory.
“It is also true that no "jet" engine of any kind was ever tested or produced at "JPL"—which was always strictly a rocket laboratory.”
Dark Mission
ch12:90865-90988
JPL had deep Army ties via its initial JATO contracts.
“(which had deep Army ties—via those initial JATO contracts)”
Dark Mission
ch12:107208-107256
NASA acquired the services of JPL, previously an Army contractor.
“the services of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, as noted, hitherto an Army contractor”
Dark Mission
ch12:113605-113679
An Army/JPL team launched Explorer 1, the first successful US satellite, on 1958-01-31.
“the German team launched the first successful U.S. satellite, Explorer 1, on January 31, 1958, in conjunction with JPL”
Dark Mission
ch12:107088-107203
After Apollo 11's lunar liftoff and rendezvous, CBS's television unit relocated to JPL to cover the rest of the flight.
“After the heady events of that unforgettable 32 hours... the successful liftoff of the Lunar Module "Eagle" and rendezvous with the Command Module "Columbia," still in lunar orbit—CBS moved our unit up the street, to the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena.”
Dark Mission
21
Jack Parsons was one of the founders of JPL and of the Aerojet Corporation.
“went on to be one of the founders of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and of the Aerojet Corporation.”
Messengers of Deception: UFO Contacts and Cults
ch13:10110-10196
Qian Xuesen helped establish Jack Parsons's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
“Qian Xuesen, a Chinese engineer who helped establish Parsons’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and China’s ballistic missile program, also believed in an energetic force that imparted information, Qi (Chi).”
American Cosmic
ch2:29656-29851
The magic practised by Parsons and Hubbard in the 1940s had roots in ancient Egyptian ritual invoking Osiris and Horus.
“The magick being practiced by Parsons and Hubbard in Southern California in the 1940's, as JPL was born, also saw its roots in ancient Egypt, and ultimately involved the invocation of Osiris, Horus, and the rest of the *same* Egyptian pantheon.”
Dark Mission
ch12:122309-122544
Vallée links Parsons to the same extraterrestrial-superiority belief process as Hubbard, founder of the Church of Scientology.
“The same links can be traced around people like Jack Parsons, who founded JPL, and Ron Hubbard, who founded Scientology.”
Messengers of Deception: UFO Contacts and Cults
ch13:694-802
Michael Malin, a former JPL employee, was selected to build, point and control the Mars Observer camera.
“The man who would build, point and control the camera was a former JPL employee named Dr. Michael Malin.”
Dark Mission
ch10:17300-17398
Dilettoso met Hoagland at JPL during the 1980 Voyager Saturn flyby, where Hoagland was reporting on the mission.
“During the Voyager fly-by of Saturn, Dilettoso was at JPL as a contractor and it was there he met Richard C. Hoagland—who was also at the Lab working as a reporter covering the Voyager mission for American Airlines’ American Way Magazine.”
Dark Mission
ch10:19734-19965
Malin was at JPL when Dilettoso contacted him, but was planning a move to Arizona for a geology professorship.
“Malin was working at JPL at the time, but was planning a move to Arizona soon thereafter to take a position as a professor and scientist in the Geology Department.”
Dark Mission
ch10:20335-20487
Malin moved Malin Space Science Systems from ASU and JPL to San Diego, over 480 km south of JPL.
“Malin even moved his entire private company, “Malin Space Science Systems” (which held the actual Mars Observer camera contract) away from ASU in Arizona and JPL in California to San Diego (over 300 miles south of JPL in Pasadena).”
Dark Mission
ch10:27409-27630
By 1992 McDaniel pressured NASA and JPL to explain why Cydonia and the Face could not be targeted ahead of the Mars Observer launch.
“By 1992, with the September launch of Mars Observer approaching, McDaniel entered the fray. Using various political and academic contacts, he put pressure on NASA and JPL from several directions, forcing them to address, *on the record*, just why they were not able to target Cydonia or the Face specifically.”
Dark Mission
ch10:28977-29273
Hoagland and McDaniel found over forty chances to target the Face during Mars Observer's science phase.
“After consulting with Mission Planners at JPL and reviewing the technical specs, they found that there would be more on the order of *forty plus* chances to target the Face during the regular two-year science phase.”
Dark Mission
ch10:25073-25282
Hoagland said Lynn Bondurant told him JPL had learned of the Hoagland's Mars series and objected at NASA Headquarters.
“When Hoagland asked what had happened, Bondurant told him that JPL had somehow “got wind of the series,” and had absolutely “raised hell” back at Headquarters about it.”
Dark Mission
ch10:10208-10373
A JPL selection committee chose Malin's camera for Mars Global Surveyor over the Clementine instrument.
“The decision was then abruptly assigned to a “selection committee” run by JPL, who selected Malin and his camera, basically the same 1993 technology that was on Mars Observer, over the more flexible Clementine instrument”
Dark Mission
ch13:1025-1235
Malin and JPL navigators positioned the 1998-04-06 image to capture the Face nearly dead centre of the swath.
“Contrary to his previous claims about “hitting the lottery,” Malin was able to nail the Face dead center in the image on his first official attempt. Rotating the spacecraft “off-nadir” as it approached Cydonia, Malin and the JPL navigators positioned the probe and its camera to capture the Face nearly perfectly. It was dead center on both the crosstrack and downtrack of the image swath.”
Dark Mission
ch13:13465-13848
JPL employees informally called the Face natural while stressing they weren't speaking for NASA or JPL.
“Within an hour of the release of an image that they surely knew was far below the quality of what could be obtained from the raw data, JPL spin doctors had spread out to the various news media pronouncing the Face to be natural. ... these spin doctors—employees of JPL mostly—insisted that even though they were NASA scientists (and by implication smarter than most of us) they were not speaking for NASA or JPL, but only for themselves.”
Dark Mission
ch13:14864-15340
NASA and JPL took no official position on the 1998-04-06 Face image.
“NASA and JPL pronounced that neither would take an official position on the image, thereby draping both organizations in a fallacious robe of objectivity.”
Dark Mission
ch13:15353-15495
Hoagland's team studied the sky over JPL, reasoning it controlled the release and hosted the image servers.
“We decided to first look at the sky over JPL, since that was where the image release was being controlled and where the servers providing the images were almost certain to be located. It didn’t take us long, looking at the stars through Red Shift 2, to pin-point the timing for the image release.”
Dark Mission
ch13:36344-36632
The team calculated Sirius would cross 33 degrees altitude over JPL at 6:55pm on 1998-04-14, opening a ten-minute alignment window.
“At 6:55 p.m. (PDT) on the anointed date, Sirius would be passing through 33º, right over JPL. This moment in turn would open up a “window” in which the three belt stars of Orion would all pass through that 33º altitude over the next ten minutes.”
Dark Mission
ch13:36641-36878
The team kept its prediction private, reasoning publication could let JPL delay the release to scuttle the test.
“But we also realized that a public prediction could alter the conditions of the test, by providing a heads up to JPL that we were tracking them. We decided against a published prediction, since that would make it far too easy to delay the image release by a few minutes and scuttle our test.”
Dark Mission
ch13:36960-37246
The team e-mailed its prediction to specific researchers and press contacts.
“Instead, we decided to e-mail our prediction to specific researchers and members of the press, including Tom Van Flandern and Art Bell. We predicted an image release at 6:55 p.m. PDT, when Sirius was at 33º above the JPL horizon.”
Dark Mission
ch13:37252-37473
At 6:55pm on 1998-04-14, as predicted, the new Cydonia image link appeared on JPL's main web page.
“As we were watching the JPL websites, with Bara on the main JPL site and Hoagland watching the primary mirror site, we continued to refresh our browsers to insure we got the image at precisely the moment it was posted. Then at 6:55 p.m., exactly as we had predicted, the new image link appeared on the JPL main web page.”
Dark Mission
ch13:37641-37956
A link to the image appeared on JPL's mirror site ten minutes later, at 7:05pm.
“Then, exactly ten minutes after the image had appeared on the JPL main page, a link to the new image appeared at 7:05 p.m. PDT on the JPL mirror site. So they had released the image twice, in effect, once at the opening of the “alignment window” and once at the close.”
Dark Mission
ch13:38096-38359
Months later NASA and JPL revised the posted release time to 6:30pm, outside the predicted window.
“As a side note, some months later, when reorganizing the Cydonia images under a single web page, NASA/JPL changed the release date and time stamp to show that the second Cydonia image was posted at 6:30 p.m., PDT, taking the release outside the alignment window.”
Dark Mission
ch13:38437-38692
Hoagland states the image was released at 6:55 and 7:05pm, not the later-stated 6:30pm.
“The authors can categorically state that this was not the case. The images were released in just the manner described above, at 6:55 and 7:05 p.m.”
Dark Mission
ch13:38700-38844
On 1999-09-23 JPL lost contact with the 125-million-dollar Mars Climate Orbiter during its final orbit insertion burn.
“On September 23, 1999 at 9:06 a.m. UTC, JPL lost contact with the $125 million Mars Climate Orbiter (MCO) as it passed behind Mars on its final orbit insertion burn.”
Dark Mission
ch14:10536-10696
JPL could not re-establish contact with MCO; a navigation error was likely, similar to the 1993 loss of Mars Observer.
“As with the Mars Observer in 1993, these efforts failed when it was discovered that a navigation error had likely plunged the spacecraft into a terminal crash dive into the Martian atmosphere.”
Dark Mission
ch14:11028-11209
Lockheed Martin's navigation team sent MCO acceleration data in imperial units while JPL assumed metric.
“The Lockheed/Martin team transmitted acceleration data in the English system, and controllers at JPL assumed that it was metric.”
Dark Mission
ch14:11805-11926
Hoagland said Alnilam was at a 19.5-degree tetrahedral altitude over JPL when the fatal MCO burn began.
“Alnilam, the center belt star of Orion/Osiris, the Egyptian god of death, resurrection and the afterlife was positioned at the ubiquitous 19.5° tetrahedral altitude as the engine was fired.”
Dark Mission
ch14:14870-15053
Hoagland said Mintaka reached the same 19.5-degree position over JPL five minutes later, as MCO vanished behind Mars.
“Five minutes later, as MCO slipped from view behind the occultation of Mars itself, Mintaka had assumed the 19.5° ritual position.”
Dark Mission
ch14:15060-15181
Hoagland said Regulus sat on the JPL horizon when the Mars Polar Lander de-orbit burn command was sent.
“As with Mars Climate Orbiter, there was a significant alignment over JPL that fit the ritual system. This time, we saw Regulus, the heart of the lion in Leo, dead on the horizon when the command was sent to MCO to begin the de-orbit burn.”
Dark Mission
ch14:18577-18810
After both losses, NASA's Dan Goldin appointed Thomas Young's commission to investigate MPL and JPL's Mars programme.
“NASA director Dan Goldin appointed a commission headed by Thomas Young, formerly of Lockheed Martin, to investigate not only the MPL disappearance but also the entire Mars program at JPL.”
Dark Mission
ch14:19068-19251
Dark Mission reports James Oberg accused JPL employees of knowing MPL was doomed by landing-leg software problems.
“Then, just a few days before Young issued his report, former NASA chief debunker James Oberg published a story on UPI that accused JPL employees of knowing full well that the MPL was doomed (due to software problems related to the spacecraft’s landing legs) from very early on in the mission.”
Dark Mission
ch14:19256-19540
JPL employees denied Oberg's report as bunk, complete nonsense, and wacko.
“JPL employees rabidly denied the report, using words like “bunk,” “complete nonsense” and “wacko” to describe their reactions to Oberg’s charge.”
Dark Mission
ch14:19549-19686
Dark Mission reports the Young Report attributed JPL's shortfalls to Goldin's faster, better, cheaper philosophy.
“The Report underscored that the underlying reason for these shortfalls was Goldin's own decision to mandate the, "faster, better, cheaper" space management philosophy.”
Dark Mission
ch14:20017-20173
Goldin appointed a NASA Headquarters Mars Czar, removing Mars-programme authority from JPL.
“He not only appointed a new “Mars Czar” at NASA Headquarters to oversee all future Mars exploration programs (thus taking such management away from JPL)”
Dark Mission
ch14:20290-20438
On 2000-03-29 Goldin flew to JPL to address staff after the Oberg accusation and Young Report.
“Yet following NASA’s damaging previous two weeks, stretching from Oberg’s initial bizarre UPI accusation to the release of the Young Report, Dan Goldin flew on March 29, 2000 to JPL itself.”
Dark Mission
ch14:21689-21871
Dark Mission reports Goldin's speech acknowledged Admiral Bobby Inman, head of the JPL Oversight Committee at Caltech.
“I’d also like to acknowledge Admiral Inman, head of the JPL Oversight Committee at Caltech. He couldn’t be here today, but I talked to him by phone. His commitment to the team here is also unwavering. And I thank him for that...”
Dark Mission
ch14:22307-22528
In summer 1976 Ron Levin, newly out of high school, was assisting his father Gilbert Levin at JPL.
“In the summer of 1976 (when Viking landed on that oh-so-familiar “ritual date” of July 20), Ron was a newly-graduated high school student, assisting his father at JPL during that incomparable Viking Summer.”
Dark Mission
ch18:15655-15854
DiGregorio's book says the first Mars colour image showed a light-blue sky on JPL's monitors.
“At about 2:00 p.m. PDT, the first color image from the surface of another planet, Mars, began to emerge on the JPL color video monitors located in many of the surrounding buildings, specifically set up for JPL employees and media personnel to view the Viking images.”
Dark Mission
ch18:16406-16665
DiGregorio's book says a technician changed the image to a uniform orange-red scene two hours later, monitor by monitor.
“Two hours after the first color image appeared on the monitors, a technician abruptly changed the image from the light-blue sky and Arizona-like landscape to a uniform orange-red sky and landscape.”
Dark Mission
ch18:17270-17457
DiGregorio's book says Ron Levin reset the monitors and was warned by project director James S. Martin, Jr.
“Ron Levin looked in disbelief as the technician went from monitor to monitor making the change. Minutes later, Ron followed him, resetting the colors to their original appearance... It was Ron Levin being chewed out by the Viking project director himself, James S. Martin, Jr. ... He warned Ron that if he tried something like that again, *he’d be thrown out of JPL for good.*”
Dark Mission
ch18:17468-17961
DiGregorio's book says the technician told Gilbert Levin he had been instructed to make the Martian sky and landscape red.
“Months later, Gil Levin sought out the JPL Viking imaging team technician who actually made the changes and asked why it was done. The technician responded that he had instructions from the Viking imaging team that the Mars sky and landscape should be red and went around to all the monitors, “tweaking” them to make it so.”
Dark Mission
ch18:18413-18733
Gilbert Levin questioned the physics of the colour change, arguing red-scattering dust should make the surface look more blue, not red.
“If atmospheric dust were scattering red light and not blue, the sky would appear red, but since the red would be at least partially removed by the time the light hit the surface, its [the direct sunlight’s] reflection from the surface would make the surface appear more* blue *than red. There would be less red light [in the direct sunlight illumination] left to reflect.”
Dark Mission
ch18:19464-19827
Discrepancies were found between live coverage of Pathfinder's 1997-07-04 landing and JPL's later web image releases.
“Unusual (and still unresolved) discrepancies were found repeatedly, between the original (paradoxically, much clearer) initial television transmissions from CNN's live Pathfinder coverage that July 4 afternoon, and the later electronic versions of those same images released across the web by JPL”
Dark Mission
ch12:146511-146804
JPL's web-released Pathfinder images had compression artefacts, assembly errors and colour registration problems.
“JPL's web versions were full of astonishingly amateurish compression artifacts, assembly errors and blatant color registration problems”
Dark Mission
ch12:147074-147201
JPL adjusted the Pathfinder sky colour to Viking-style pink rather than the blue forecast by Hubble imagery.
“JPL even adjusted the color of the Martian sky to appear the traditional "Viking pink" instead of the forecast (from concurrent Hubble imagery)—natural Earth-like blue”
Dark Mission
ch12:147211-147374
Hoagland considered the Pathfinder image discrepancies evidence JPL was hiding something.
“JPL was clearly trying to hide (and not too well, for some reason …) "something" in these images.”
Dark Mission
ch12:147553-147643
Unlike Mars Global Surveyor, Malin and JPL did not directly control the THEMIS camera on Mars Odyssey.
“Unlike the Mars Global Surveyor, Michael Malin or JPL would not control the THEMIS visible light camera directly”
Dark Mission
ch16:13406-13510
SPSR's semi-official position held JPL deliberately degraded the Catbox image to protect its own funding.
“SPSR’s semi-official position was that yes, the Catbox image *was* deliberately degraded, but it was only done by JPL to “protect their funding.””
Dark Mission
ch15:4145-4281
SPSR reasoned that admitting the truth about Cydonia would bring a manned mission that cut JPL out of the funding loop.
“This dubious (if not ridiculous) position is based on the idea that admitting the truth about Cydonia would inevitably result in a manned mission to Mars, and in such a venture JPL would be out of the funding loop.”
Dark Mission
ch15:4291-4501