The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) is a US federal agency that coordinates the activities of the American intelligence community. Within the field of unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) research, ODNI has featured chiefly as a statutory recipient and co-author of government reporting mandated by the United States Congress, and as an employer of several figures prominent in UAP-related testimony and journalism.
Congressional interest in ODNI’s role dates to December 2020, when Marco Rubio, then head of the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, asked ODNI and the Pentagon to deliver Congress an unclassified UAP report within a month.1 The Senate Intelligence Committee had separately ordered the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Defense to produce a report on UAP sightings on the same timescale.2 Senate Report 116-233, accompanying the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, directed ODNI, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, to submit an intelligence assessment of the UAP threat and to report on the progress of the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF).3 The resulting document, the Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (2021-06), was issued jointly by the UAPTF and ODNI in June 2021.4 It defines UAP as objects that are not immediately identifiable and lack a single explanation,5 and sets out five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, US government or industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a catch-all “other” category.6
ODNI has continued to feature in the reporting structure established by this legislation. It submitted the 2022 Annual Report on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena to United States Congress on 2023-01-12,7 which recorded 510 total UAP reports: the 144 reports covering the 17-year period addressed in the preliminary assessment, plus 247 new reports and 119 reports subsequently discovered or reported.8 Since the establishment of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), that office has provided quarterly reports, semiannual briefings, and an annual report to Congress in coordination with ODNI.9 More broadly, ODNI has published public reports documenting UAP.10
Several individuals central to UAP disclosure have passed through ODNI. Luis Elizondo, a former counter-intelligence officer with the United States Department of Defense (DoD), most recently worked out of ODNI before his public advocacy on UAP.11 Over his career he worked within the DoD, the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive (ONCIX), ODNI, and the Office of the Secretary of Defense.12 At ODNI, Devon Woods served as Elizondo’s unofficial mentor;13 Woods had previously built a career at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) before joining ODNI,14 and in 2010 moved from a senior ODNI leadership role to a senior director post at the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA).15 Christopher Mellon said he believed the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) had not included any of the thousands of annual “Uncorrelated Tracks” identified by its radars in the ODNI report.16
ODNI has also convened outside scientific input on UAP. Avi Loeb said he was visited at home by an ODNI representative who asked him to lead a science advisory council;17 Loeb has stated the governing board of Avi Loeb’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) science advisory council includes representatives from ODNI, The White House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the intelligence community, with access to classified material.18 When Congressman Eric Burlison asked ODNI officials about plasmoid-type phenomena observed at a Western United States military installation, the officials said neither they nor their top scientists knew what they were.19
ODNI has featured in allegations of programme concealment made by David Charles Grusch. Grusch said he would use his expertise to help Burlison and Congress restore oversight and hold accountable those who broke the law and lied to Congress, the White House, ODNI, and the United States Department of Justice (DOJ).20 He has also said that while working in the intelligence community he worked on sensitive programmes purposely hidden from ODNI oversight staff and briefed only to the White House, kept from Congress through what he described as a shell game of non-reporting.21