Carl Jung, described as a psychologist and mystic, entered into a correspondence with physicist Wolfgang Pauli after the apparently arbitrary value of the fine structure constant led Pauli to seek an explanation for its origin.1 According to The Fourth Mind, the constant’s value troubled Pauli enough that he initiated the exchange himself, in search of an explanation that might lie in the mysteries of the spirit.2 Jung separately observed that contemporary physics had revealed so many scientific truths that appeared miraculous that the Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) phenomenon could easily be regarded and believed in as a physicist’s miracle.3
Jung wrote about UFOs directly as a phenomenon of myth and legend. He called it a “living myth” and a “universal mass rumor” reserved for an enlightened, rationalist age,4 and wrote that the modern phenomenon of flying saucers offered “a golden opportunity of seeing how a legend is formed."5 American Cosmic also records that Jung called the UFO a “technological angel."6
Jung’s approach to the subject began, he said, by denying that there was a real UFO, since the apparent impossibility of a UFO report suggested to common sense that the most likely explanation lay in a psychic disturbance.7 He wrote that a person who prides himself on sound common sense would feel distinctly affronted by reports of UFOs,8 and recognised that no sensible person would admit to belief in them.9 Even so, he argued that psychologists conscious of their responsibilities should not be dissuaded from critically examining a mass phenomenon of this kind.10 Diana Walsh Pasulka has written that Jung’s point was not that the UFO was actually impossible, only that it was apparently so, and that his aim was to move study of the phenomenon into the realm of the psyche.11 To describe the process by which an individual or group makes sense of an unfamiliar object - whether an aerial phenomenon or an image encountered in dreams or visions - Jung introduced the concept of amplificatory interpretation.12
Jung also wrote that, despite Americans’ camera-mindedness, few authentic photographs of UFOs seemed to exist even though many had reportedly been observed for hours at close quarters,13 and recounted knowing of someone who witnessed a UFO in Guatemala together with hundreds of other people, had a camera to hand, but forgot to photograph it during a daytime sighting that lasted about an hour.14 Writing decades later, Pasulka suggested that the work of Tyler D. and James Master would spawn rumours of the kind Jung described - shoots or hints of information that others interpret and spin into stories and narratives that constitute the UFO narrative and, ultimately, religion.15 She concluded that such cultural narratives about the UFO phenomenon form through processes anticipated by Jung’s concept of amplificatory interpretation.16
American Cosmic describes Jung’s concept of synchronicity (Jungian concept) as the coming together of inner and outer events that are not causally linked but are very meaningful to the person experiencing them.17 David Stinnett has said he does not regard synchronicity as remarkable, holding that if one is doing things correctly, synchronicity is simply how the world functions - quoting Jung’s observation that “synchronicity is an ever present reality for those with eyes to see."18 Julia Mossbridge has likewise defined synchronicity in the Jungian sense as things that appear completely disconnected but come to have great meaning when put together.19 Jung also proposed the idea of the collective unconscious, a field in which all people share.20 Whitley Strieber has argued, however, that Jung’s theory of archetypes does not explain the universality of animal portraiture found in the Stone Age.21
Other researchers have drawn on Jung’s framework in discussing specific cases. Douglass Price-Williams has said that certain scorpion-like entities reported in UFO encounters should be understood as tellurian, “chthonic” beings, in terms he attributes to Jung.22 Jacques Vallée has suggested that the mechanism behind UFO apparitions may be a possible invariant across all cultures, and has questioned whether it constitutes a psychic technology whose applications know few limitations in space and time.23