Project STARGATE was the code name for a secret programme, run principally by the United States Army, that trained and used remote viewing (RV) practitioners for intelligence purposes during the Cold War.1 The effort grew out of a broader search by the US government for what has been described as a “mind reading” weapon to gain an advantage over the Soviet Union.2 It began in the 1970s as a classified project at a research lab in California, before its operational element moved to an army base in Maryland.3 A related, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)-funded remote-viewing programme had already been running at the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) since 1972.4 Project STARGATE was terminated in November 1995,5 reportedly because of unreliable results.6
No established method for training someone in remote viewing existed when the programme was organised,7 so its founders first turned to SRI International, where the phenomenon had already been studied for nearly five years.8 The Army resolved to find, train, and use remote viewers for the effort,9 drawing on William G. Braud’s paper “Psi Conducive States” to help identify possible subjects.10 Military personnel tasked with locating psychics compiled their own list of indicators against a military background,11 including consistent success whatever the task,12 being well liked by peers while considered different from the norm,13 and a willingness to pursue new avenues of approach.14 One of the programme’s original recruits was Joseph McMoneagle,1 who over an eighteen-year consultancy from 1984 to 1995 took part in protocol design, research and development evaluations, and thousands of remote-viewing trials supporting experimental research and active intelligence operations,15 performing applications remote viewing until the programme closed in November 1995.16 McMoneagle later recalled that in the programme’s early stages there was considerable concern for participants’ psychological stability,17 addressed through extensive psychological testing, numerous interviews, and a gradual programme of exposure intended to ensure that only centred and stable individuals were allowed to participate.18 That vetting process was later dropped to reduce costs,19 which McMoneagle said left previously stable individuals, in more than one case, stripped of their psychological boundaries and left emotionally or mentally unstable.20
Within Project STARGATE, no one was considered a remote viewer until training was complete,21 a process that typically took a minimum of three to eighteen months depending on the individual’s talent.22 Highly talented trainees could become productive within ninety days,23 while those with little natural aptitude either used the full training term or failed to complete it.24 Early methods for evaluating remote-viewing material were tuned specifically to drawings.25 On the military side, viewers worked from military maps whose letter-and-number coordinate combinations varied between maps rather than following a standard grid, a form of Coordinate Remote Viewing intended to counter scepticism about the viewers’ eidetic memory.26 The true map coordinates were sealed inside opaque envelopes marked on the outside with false coordinates, lacking degrees, minutes, and seconds, that served only as an identifier for that day’s project.27 Protocols were further extended to address additional target categories, including ideas, concepts, plans, thoughts, feelings, and emotions.28 McMoneagle was himself trained in dowsing while assigned to the programme at Maryland Fort Meade.29
Ed Dames was part of the programme during the 1980s,30 selected as one of five prototype Army members trained by Ingo Swann during 1983 and 1984.31 Swann developed the remote-viewing structure used to train that prototype team,32 and had Dames remote-view the Washington Monument as one of his first training targets.33 Dames has said he was trained by Swann as a remote viewer while serving in the United States Army during the 1980s.34 He went on to serve as the operations and training officer for the Department of Defense’s Project Stargate program.35 Dames also used Robert Monroe’s programme, developed through The Monroe Institute, on altered states and out-of-body experiences to evaluate potential recruits.36 Scepticism persisted even within the military: the United States Air Force (USAF)’s chief of staff for intelligence did not believe the programme’s remote viewers could do what they claimed.37
Findings from the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory, for which Edwin C. May and colleagues were directly responsible from 1986 until the programme’s termination,38 were shared with and used by the operational unit at Fort Meade for most of the programme’s existence.39 According to McMoneagle, laboratory findings that called for changes to specific applications were sometimes dismissed as unnecessary or discarded by Fort Meade’s project managers,40 and there was a large discrepancy between good and bad managers, with full managerial responsibility resting with the Fort Meade unit.41 Operationally, remote viewers took part in efforts to locate hostages kidnapped by Islamic terrorist groups42 and to trace the movements of fugitive criminals within the United States.43 The 2017 Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) declassification of Project Stargate records released approximately 12 million pages of records revealing new details about the programme.44 As of the 2013 publication of one first-hand account, however, ninety-nine percent of material relating to the operational Fort Meade unit had still not been declassified.45
Since the programme’s closure, McMoneagle has had dealings with dozens of television production companies, journalists, authors, and radio hosts.46 Over the programme’s eighteen-year run, McMoneagle estimated that roughly eighty to eighty-five people were involved on both the scientific and operational sides, counting support and viewer personnel,47 of whom probably fewer than three dozen were remote viewers themselves,48 with about half of the remaining non-viewer staff working as scientists and the rest performing support functions such as evaluation, analysis, and operational monitoring.49 McMoneagle said that dozens of targets worked by viewers within the programme produced successful predictions relating to people, places, or things, generally 90 to 365 days ahead.50 According to Remote Viewing Secrets, opinion within the programme was divided on whether the skill could be taught: some members believed anyone could learn remote viewing, while others believed it could not be taught at all.51