“Papua New Guinea Inquiry Re Overflights” is a record dated 1985-01-28 concerning an informal inquiry received by the Embassy Port Moresby USA in Papua New Guinea, National Capital District, Port Moresby. Gardner (AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY) said that the Papua New Guinea National Intelligence Organization (NIO) had asked about reported high-altitude, high-speed aircraft over Papua New Guinea during the evening of 1985-01-24.1 Gardner said the inquiry followed reports received by an NIO officer in Papua New Guinea, East Sepik Province, Wewak, where local residents had reportedly been frightened by the overflights.2 He said that this reaction led the provincial premier to call a public meeting,3 attended by Papua New Guinea’s Prime Minister, who was spending the weekend in his electoral district.4
Gardner said the NIO had reported various Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) on the night of 1985-01-24, including fast-moving objects with lights, contrails, and noise.5 He added that the NIO placed some credence in a report from an Air Niugini pilot who had just departed Wewak for Port Moresby.6 According to the source record, the pilot’s radar detected aircraft travelling south to north at high altitude and high speed while he was over Papua New Guinea, East Sepik Province, Angoram.7 The record also reports visual contrail sightings from several locations, including one aircraft travelling north to south at 19:00 local time,8 and six to eight aircraft travelling south to north at 22:00 local time.9
The record also documents an attempt to compare the reports with information about known aircraft. Gardner said that, based on Embassy records and a telephone conversation with the 43rd Strategic Wing (43SW), the Embassy knew of no B-52 overflights and no US aircraft in Papua New Guinea airspace on 1985-01-24.10 He characterised the information supplied to the Embassy as very sketchy and said that sources were unsure of the directions in which the aircraft were flying.11 Gardner subsequently requested confirmation of the finding and any further light on the reports.12 The source therefore preserves both the reported observations and the uncertainty surrounding their interpretation, while recording the official inquiry and the check against military information.