“Intelligence Officials Say U.S. Has Retrieved Craft of Non-Human Origin” is an investigative article published on 2023-06-05 by The Debrief, written by Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal, with contributions from Helene Cooper, Tim McMillan, Micah Hanks, Craig Labadie, and Sean Munger.34 The article centres on the disclosures of David Grusch, a former intelligence official and decorated combat veteran who served in Afghanistan,1 identifying him as the primary source of the 2023 Grusch UAP Whistleblower Disclosures. Kean and Blumenthal previously co-authored a 2017-12-17 front-page article in The New York Times that disclosed the existence of a secret Pentagon programme investigating UAP.34
Grusch is described as a veteran of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency and the National Reconnaissance Office,5 who served as the National Reconnaissance Office’s representative to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) from 2019 to 20216 and as the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency’s co-lead for UAP analysis and representative to the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) from late 2021 to 2022-07.7 The article states that his on-the-record statements were cleared for open publication by the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review on 2023-04-04 and 2023-04-06.10 Grusch alleges that the US government, its allies, and defence contractors have made recoveries of partial fragments through to intact vehicles of non-human origin for decades through the present day,8 and that analysis determined the retrieved objects are of exotic origin based on vehicle morphologies, material science testing, unique atomic arrangements, and radiological signatures.9 He additionally alleges that this information has been illegally withheld from Congress2 and that UAP recovery operations have been illegally shielded from proper Congressional oversight by elements of the intelligence community.26
The article corroborates Grusch’s account with testimony from two named intelligence officials. Karl E. Nell, a recently retired Army Colonel11 who served as the Department of the Army’s liaison for the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF) from 2021 to 2022 and worked alongside Grusch,12 characterised Grusch as “beyond reproach”13 and stated that Grusch’s assertion concerning a decades-long terrestrial arms race over reverse engineering of technologies of unknown origin is “fundamentally correct."14 Jonathan Grey, described as a generational officer of the US Intelligence Community with a Top-Secret clearance who currently works for the National Air and Space Intelligence Center with UAP analysis as his focus,18 stated publicly for the first time that “the non-human intelligence phenomenon is real”19 and that retrievals of this kind are not limited to the United States, describing it as a global phenomenon.20 Grey further stated that the existence of complex historical programmes involving coordinated retrieval and study of exotic materials, dating back to the early 20th century, should no longer remain secret.33 The article also notes that the National Air and Space Intelligence Center is the Department of Defense (DoD)’s primary Air Force source for foreign air and space threat analysis, headquartered at Wright Patterson Air Force Base.
Christopher K. Mellon, who served as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence,15 also contributed testimony, stating that well-placed current and former officials had shared with him detailed information about an alleged programme, including insights into its history, governing documents, and the location where a craft was allegedly abandoned and recovered.16 Mellon additionally stated that a number of potential sources do not trust the leadership of the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) established by Congress.17 The article reports that Grusch told Congress of a decades-long publicly unknown Cold War for recovered and exploited physical material, describing competition with near-peer adversaries to identify UAP crashes and retrieve material for reverse engineering to garner asymmetric national defence advantages.22 Beginning in 2022, Grusch provided Congress with hours of recorded classified information transcribed into hundreds of pages, though Congress has not been provided with any physical materials related to wreckage or other non-human objects.23,24
The article describes the formal complaint process that preceded the public disclosures. In 2021-07, Grusch confidentially provided classified information to the Department of Defense Inspector General concerning the withholding of UAP-related information from Congress.27 In 2022-05, Charles McCullough III — who served as the original Inspector General of the Intelligence Community Inspector General, confirmed by the US Senate in 2011, and is described at the time of publication as senior partner of the Compass Rose Legal Group — filed a Grusch Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Complaint on Grusch’s behalf.25 An unclassified version of the complaint states that UAP-related classified information has been withheld from Congress by elements of the intelligence community to thwart legitimate Congressional oversight of the UAP programme.26 The Intelligence Community Inspector General found the complaint credible and urgent in 2022-07,27 after which a summary was submitted to Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.28 Grusch also filed a complaint alleging that he suffered illegal retaliation for his disclosures, and the article notes that the Grusch Retaliation Matter was subject to a whistleblower reprisal investigation.3 Grusch departed the government on 2023-04-07.29
The article situates the disclosures within the broader legislative context of the Fiscal Year 2023 (FY2023) National Defense Authorization Act, spearheaded by Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Marco Rubio and signed into law by Joe Biden in 2022-12,30 which Grusch helped draft and which tasked the Secretary of Defense with establishing a secure mechanism for reporting sensitive information, and asked for reporting on material retrieval, analysis, and reverse engineering involving UAP going back decades. Garry Nolan, described as a Professor in the Department of Pathology at Stanford University with more than three hundred published papers,31 is quoted on the potential significance of studying anomalous materials. The UAP Reverse Engineering Legacy Programs and the use of Special Access Programs (concept) and Waived Unacknowledged Special Access Program structures to conceal UAP activities from oversight form a recurring theme, and the article draws a line from the 2017 NYT Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) Story Publication through the First Open Congressional Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Hearing 2022, at which Andre Carson presided, to the present disclosures as part of a Claimed historical UAP recovery and exploitation lineage and a broader pattern of USAF non-cooperation with Pentagon UAP work.