Skip to content

David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee

Written testimony submitted by retired US Navy Commander David Fravor to the United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability on 2023-07-26, describing his first-hand account of the 2004 USS Nimitz UAP encounter and calling for congressional oversight of government UAP programmes.

Pdf · U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability · 2023-07-26

The David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee is a written testimony submitted on 2023-07-26 by David Fravor, a retired Commander in the United States Navy,1 to the United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability. The statement constitutes Fravor’s first-hand account of the 2004 USS Nimitz UAP encounter and sets out his views on congressional oversight of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) programmes. It was submitted as part of the same United States Congress hearing at which David Grusch testified.

Fravor opens by establishing the operational context. In November 2004 he was the Commanding Officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 41 (VFA-41), known as the Black Aces,2 which was attached to Carrier Air Wing Eleven (CVW-11) and stationed aboard the USS Nimitz (CVN-68).3 The squadron was at the beginning of a workup cycle in preparation for a combat deployment to the Persian Gulf supporting ground forces in Iraq.4 On the day in question, Fravor was scheduled to lead a two-versus-two air-to-air training exercise,5 with his flight of two F/A-18F Super Hornets acting as Blue Air under the control of the USS Princeton (CG-59),6 while the Red Air opposing force was provided by Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 232 (VMFA-232).7 After launching from the Nimitz, the Princeton controller suspended the training exercise for real-world tasking.8

Fravor’s flight was directed towards a contact roughly 64 kilometres south of the ship.9 The aircraft had nothing on their radars as they proceeded west.10 The statement relays that the air controller aboard the Princeton had been observing objects on the Aegis Combat System for the previous two weeks,11 with the objects descending from above approximately 24,000 metres rapidly down to approximately 6,000 metres, remaining for hours, then ascending straight back up.12 On arrival at the contact area, Fravor’s flight observed a small white object shaped like a Tic Tac (2004 Nimitz UAP) with its longitudinal axis pointing north-south, moving abruptly over disturbed white water in the ocean.13 The object displayed no rotors, no rotor wash, and no visible flight control surfaces such as wings.14 As Fravor descended towards it, the object shifted its longitudinal axis to align with his aircraft and began a clockwise climbing turn.15 When Fravor manoeuvred to pull nose onto the object at approximately 0.8 kilometres range,16 at an altitude of approximately 4,600 metres with the object at about 3,700 metres,17 it rapidly accelerated and disappeared from view; his wingman, positioned roughly 2,400 metres above, also lost visual.16 The disturbed water was gone when Fravor looked back at the ocean surface.18 The object subsequently reappeared on the Princeton’s AN/SPY-1 radar at the Combat Air Patrol point roughly 97 kilometres to the east,19 having covered that distance in less than a minute.20 In Fravor’s assessment, the object was far superior in performance to his brand-new F/A-18F and did not operate by any known aerodynamic principles.21

The statement addresses the associated video and radar records. A crew from Fravor’s squadron subsequently took the approximately 90-second targeting pod video released by the US government in 2017,22 known as the Nimitz Tic Tac targeting pod video (FLIR1). That video shows the object emitting no infrared plume consistent with a normal propulsion system.23 A radar tape also showed jamming of the AN/APG-73 radar in the aircraft, though this tape is not part of the released video.24 Fravor states that the encounter was never investigated by the United States Department of Defense (DoD), none of his crew were ever questioned, and no tapes were collected at the time.25

The statement traces the subsequent history of official interest in the encounter. In 2009, Jay Stratton contacted Fravor to investigate the incident.26 Fravor identifies Stratton as part of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP) — which he refers to in the statement as the Anomalous Threat Identification Program — led by Elizondo, Luis (Lue) out of the Pentagon.27 Later, Alex Dietrich, the other pilot in Fravor’s flight, contacted him to ask whether he had been approached about the incident since 2009;28 she had herself been invited to the Pentagon multiple times to discuss the encounter and to view other UAP videos.29 Fravor was then contacted by Elizondo in 2016 shortly after speaking with Dietrich.30 The statement notes that Elizondo subsequently left the Pentagon in protest and joined Tom DeLonge, Chris Mellon, Steve Justice, and others to form To The Stars Academy.31

The final section addresses policy. Fravor states that coverage of the encounter by The New York Times in December 2017 — with reporting by Leslie Kean, Ralph Blumenthal, and Helene Cooper — led to interest from elected officials in understanding the nature, origin, and technology of the observed craft.32 He further states that this coverage contributed to the whistleblower protection provisions in the Whistleblower protections in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).33 Fravor notes that multiple witnesses are coming forward with first-hand knowledge of UAP-related matters, referencing testimony by David Grusch.34 He expresses concern about the absence of congressional oversight over any government programmes involving craft not believed to originate from this world,35 and closes by stating his assessment that the Tic Tac object engaged in November 2004 is far superior to anything the United States had at the time, possesses today, or is looking to develop in the next ten or more years.36

  1. Fravor was a retired Commander in the United States Navy
    “My name is David Fravor and I am a retired Commander in the U.S Navy.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 2
  2. In November 2004, Fravor was the Commanding Officer of VFA-41, known as the Black Aces
    “In Nov 2004, I was the Commanding Officer of Strike Fighter Squadron Forty-One, the World Famous Black Aces!”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 2
  3. VFA-41 was attached to CVW-11 and stationed aboard USS Nimitz
    “We were attached to Carrier Airwing Eleven and stationed onboard the USS Nimitz (CVN-68).”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 2
  4. The squadron was preparing for a combat deployment to the Persian Gulf
    “We were at the beginning of our workup cycle that would prepare us for a combat deployment to the Persian Gulf for operations supporting the ground forces in Iraq.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 2
  5. Fravor was scheduled to lead a two-versus-two air-to-air training exercise
    “I was scheduled to lead a 2 V 2 Air to Air training exercise.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 3
  6. Fravor's flight of two F/A-18F Super Hornets was being controlled by USS Princeton
    “My flight of 2 F/A-18Fs was the Blue Air, the good guys, and we were being controlled by the USS Princeton, CG-59.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 3
  7. The Red Air opposing force was flown by VMFA-232
    “The Red Air was being flown by our Marine F/A-18 squadron VMFA-232.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 3
  8. After launch, the Princeton controller suspended training for real-world tasking
    “As we launched off the USS Nimitz, we checked in with the air controller on the USS Princeton, we were told that training was going to be suspended for real world tasking.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 4
  9. Fravor and his wingman proceeded towards a contact roughly 64 kilometres south of the ship
    “we proceeded towards a contact to the west of our CAP (Combat Air Patrol) point. The CAP point is where we would hold prior to commencing our training runs, roughly 40 miles South of the ship.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 4
  10. Fravor's flight had nothing on their radars as they proceeded west toward the contact
    “we had nothing on our radars and were unaware of what we were going to see when we arrived.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 5
  11. The air controller had been observing the objects on the Aegis Combat System for two weeks
    “The air controller on the ship also had no idea but had been observing these objects on their Aegis combat system for the previous 2 weeks.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 5
  12. Objects had been descending from above approximately 24,000 metres to approximately 6,000 metres, staying for hours then going straight back up
    “They had been descending from above 80,000ft and coming rapidly down to 20,000ft would stay for hours and then go straight back up.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 5
  13. Fravor saw a small white Tic Tac shaped object with its longitudinal axis pointing north-south, moving abruptly over white water
    “we saw a small white Tic Tac shaped object with the longitudinal axis pointing N/S and moving very abruptly over the white water.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 6
  14. The object had no rotors, no rotor wash, and no visible flight control surfaces such as wings
    “There were no Rotors, No Rotor wash, or any visible flight control surfaces like wings.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 6
  15. As Fravor descended, the object shifted its axis to align with his aircraft and began a clockwise climbing turn
    “the object suddenly shifted it longitudinal axis, aligned it with my aircraft and began to climb in a clockwise climbing turn.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 1, paragraph 6
  16. At approximately 0.8 kilometres range, the object rapidly accelerated and disappeared
    “As we pulled nose onto the object at approximately 1/2 of a mile with the object just left of our nose, it rapidly accelerated and disappeared right in front of our aircraft. Our wingman, roughly 8,000ft above us, also lost visual.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 1
  17. Fravor's altitude was approximately 4,600 metres and the object was at about 3,700 metres when he pulled nose onto it
    “Our altitude at this point was approximately 15,000ft with the Tic Tac at about 12,000ft.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 1
  18. After the object disappeared, the white water was also gone
    “We immediately turned to investigate the white water only to find that it was also gone.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 1
  19. The object reappeared on Princeton's AN/SPY-1 radar at the CAP point roughly 97 kilometres east
    “the air controller let us know that the object had reappeared on the Princeton's Aegis SPY 1 radar at our CAP point.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 1
  20. The object travelled approximately 97 kilometres in less than a minute
    “This Tic Tac Object had just traveled 60 miles in a very short period of time (less than a minute)”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 1
  21. The object was far superior in performance to the F/A-18F and did not operate by known aerodynamic principles
    “was far superior in performance to my brand-new F/A-18F and did not operate with any of the known aerodynamic principles that we expect for objects that fly in our atmosphere.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 1
  22. A crew from Fravor's squadron took the approximately 90-second video released by the US government in 2017
    “It was that crew that took the now famous approximately 90 second video that was released by the USG in 2017.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 2
  23. A radar tape showed jamming of the AN/APG-73 radar and is not part of the released video
    “What is not seen is the Radar tape that showed the jamming of the APG-73 radar in the aircraft”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 2
  24. The targeting pod video shows the object does not emit any infrared plume from a normal propulsion system
    “we do see on the targeting pod video that the object does not emit any IR (infrared) plume from a normal propulsion system that we would expect.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 2
  25. The encounter was never investigated, no crew were questioned, and tapes were never taken
    “What is shocking is that the incident was never investigated, none of my crew were ever questioned, tapes were never taken, and after a couple of days, it turned into a great story to tell friends.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 3
  26. Jay Stratton contacted Fravor in 2009 to investigate the encounter
    “Not until 2009 did Jay Stratton contact me to investigate what we observed.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 3
  27. Stratton was part of the Anomalous Threat Identification Program led by Luis Elizondo out of the DoD
    “Unbeknownst to all of us, Jay was part of the ATIP (Anomalous Threat Identification Program) program led by Lue Elizondo out of the DOD.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 3
  28. Alex Dietrich contacted Fravor to ask whether he had been contacted about the incident after 2009
    “Years later I was contacted by Alex Dietrich, the other pilot in my flight asking if I had ever been contacted about the incident after 2009.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 4
  29. Dietrich had been invited to the Pentagon multiple times to discuss the encounter and view other UAP videos
    “Alex stated that she had been invited to the Pentagon multiple times to discuss the event and view other videos of UAPs.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 4
  30. Fravor was contacted by Luis Elizondo in 2016 shortly after speaking with Dietrich
    “I was contacted by Mr Elizondo shortly after talking with Alex in 2016.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 4
  31. Elizondo left the Pentagon in protest and joined DeLonge, Mellon, Justice and others to form To The Stars Academy
    “I was made aware that Lue had left the pentagon in protest and joined forces with Tom Delonge, Chris Mellon, Steve Justice and others to form To The Stars Academy.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 5
  32. The December 2017 New York Times articles led to interest from elected officials in understanding what the craft are
    “It has led to an Interest from our elected officials who are not focused on "Little Green men" but on figuring out what these craft are, where are they from, the technology they possess, and how do they operate.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 2, paragraph 6 to page 3, paragraph 1
  33. The New York Times coverage led to whistleblower protection provisions in the NDAA
    “It has also led to the Whistleblower protection act in the recent NDAA which brings us too today.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 3, paragraph 1
  34. Multiple witnesses are coming forward with first-hand knowledge, which David Grusch would discuss
    “There are multiple witnesses coming forward that say that they have first-hand knowledge, that I'm sure Mr Grusch will or already has discussed.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 3, paragraph 2
  35. Fravor expressed concern about lack of congressional oversight on government programmes involving craft not believed to be from this world
    “What concerns me is that there is no "Oversight" from our elected officials on anything associated with our government possessing or working on craft that we believe are not from this world.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 3, paragraph 2
  36. Fravor considered the Tic Tac object far superior to anything the US had at the time or is looking to develop in ten or more years
    “the Tic Tac Object that we engaged in Nov 2004 was far superior to anything that we had at the time, have today, or are looking to develop in the next 10+ years.”
    David Fravor Statement for the House Oversight Committee page 3, paragraph 3
View the facts breakdown in the workbench →

Every claim and entity extracted from this record, each citing the original wording, in the review workbench.

Language

30 languages covering 80% of the world's literate population

English English English (US) English (US) Spanish Español Portuguese Português Indonesian Bahasa Indonesia French Français Swahili Kiswahili Vietnamese Tiếng Việt Turkish Türkçe German Deutsch Italian Italiano Uzbek Oʻzbekcha Polish Polski Tagalog Tagalog
Mandarin 中文 Traditional Chinese 繁體中文 Japanese 日本語 Korean 한국어
Arabic العربية Urdu اردو Persian فارسی
Russian Русский Ukrainian Українська
Hindi हिन्दी Bengali বাংলা Thai ไทย Burmese မြန်မာ Telugu తెలుగు Marathi मराठी Tamil தமிழ்