The DoD's UAP efforts have been infrequent and inconclusive over past decades
“Over the past decades, the DoD has initiated infrequent and inconclusive efforts to identify and understand the origin, capabilities, and intent of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP).”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
Military pilots have historically reported many UAP sightings
“Military pilots have historically reported many of the reported UAP sightings.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
The Air Force and Navy have been at the forefront of developing UAP reporting policies
“the Air Force and Navy have been at the forefront of developing policies, procedures, and mechanisms for reporting UAP.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
Project Sign was established in December 1947 to investigate unidentified flying object sightings
“The DoD's first official UAP-focused activities occurred in December 1947, when the U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff established PROJECT SIGN to investigate the first recorded observations of unidentified flying objects.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
Air Force personnel investigated 243 reported UAP sightings under Project Sign from 1947 to 1949
“From 1947 to 1949, Air Force personnel investigated 243 reported UAP sightings.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
Project Blue Book was initiated in 1952 by the U.S. Air Force Director of Intelligence
“In 1952, the U.S. Air Force Director of Intelligence initiated PROJECT BLUE BOOK to investigate unidentified flying objects.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
Over 12,000 reported sightings were investigated under Project Blue Book between 1952 and 1969
“Between 1952 and 1969, Air Force personnel investigated over 12,000 reported sightings.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
In mid-2000, Congress initiated and funded the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications Program under the DIA
“The DoD did not officially look at UAP again until mid-2000, when select members of Congress initiated and funded a program to study UAP, called the Advanced Aerospace Weapon Systems Applications program, under the direction of the Defense Intelligence Agency.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
Since 2000, several DoD-wide UAP reporting programmes were attempted but never fully implemented
“Since then, the DoD has attempted to establish several programs for coordinating DoD-wide UAP reporting; however, none of the programs were ever fully implemented.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
Congress directed the DoD to establish a formal interagency UAP entity through the FY2022 NDAA
“In 2020, as a result of increased concerns of flight crew safety, national security, and adversary technology advances, Congress directed the DoD, through the FY 2022 National Defense Authorization Act, to develop, fund, and staff a formal interagency entity to study, collect data, and report on UAP.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
AARO was established on 2022-07-20 as the formal interagency entity for UAP
“On July 20, 2022, the DoD established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to be that entity.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 1, Historical Background
The FY2023 NDAA defined UAP to include airborne, transmedium, and submerged objects not immediately identifiable
“The FY 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) defined UAP as "unidentified anomalous phenomena," which include: (a) airborne objects that are not immediately identifiable, (b) transmedium objects or devices, and (c) submerged objects or devices that are not immediately identifiable.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 2, Background
The ODNI Preliminary Assessment identified five potential explanatory categories for UAP
“According to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence's Preliminary Assessment on UAP, UAP are objects that are not immediately identifiable, lack a single explanation, and fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric phenomena, U.S. Government or industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a catchall "other" category.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 2, Background
DoD UAP efforts have been irregular because of competing priorities, lack of progress, and inconclusive findings
“DoD efforts to identify and understand UAP have been irregular because of competing priorities, lack of substantive progress, and inconclusive findings.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 2, Senate Armed Services Committee Fiscal Year Reports
Congressional committees included UAP concerns in the FY2019 through FY2023 NDAAs and a Senate intelligence report
“Congressional committees included language about their UAP concerns in the FYs 2019 through 2023 NDAAs and a Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Report on the FY 2021 Intelligence Authorization Act.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 2, Senate Armed Services Committee Fiscal Year Reports
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence identified lack of a unified process for collecting and analysing UAP intelligence
“In the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Report on the FY 2021 Intelligence Authorization Act, the Senate Select Committee identified concerns that the U.S. Government did not have a unified, comprehensive process in place for collecting and analyzing intelligence on UAP.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 2, Senate Armed Services Committee Fiscal Year Reports
The UAPTF was established in August 2020 to develop standardised UAP reporting requirements
“in August 2020 the DoD established a UAP Task Force (UAPTF) to develop standardized reporting requirements for UAP encounters.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 3
The UAPTF and ODNI issued the Preliminary Assessment on UAP in June 2021
“In June 2021, the UAPTF and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued the congressionally mandated Preliminary Assessment on UAP”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 3
The Preliminary Assessment found UAP reporting data largely inconclusive and government-wide consolidation inconsistent
“the congressionally mandated Preliminary Assessment on UAP, which stated that UAP reporting data are largely inconclusive, as well as a consolidation of reports across the U.S. Government is inconsistent.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 3
In November 2021, the Deputy Secretary of Defense directed establishment of the AOIMSG as successor to the UAPTF
“In a November 2021 memorandum, the Deputy Secretary of Defense directed the OUSD(I&S) to establish the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG) as the successor to the UAPTF to synchronize efforts across the DoD and with other Federal departments and agencies to detect, identify, and characterize objects of interest in special use airspace.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 3
The AOIMSG did not reach operational capability and was disestablished on 2022-07-15
“The AOIMSG did not reach operational capability and the Deputy Secretary disestablished it on July 15, 2022.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 3
AARO was established in July 2022 to implement duties previously assigned to the AOIMSG
“In July 2022, the DoD established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to implement the duties previously assigned to the AOIMSG.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 3
The OIG determined the DoD has not used a coordinated approach to detect, report, collect, analyse, and identify UAP
“the DoD has not used a coordinated approach to detect, report, collect, analyze, and identify UAP;”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 5
Geographic combatant commands were largely excluded from developing UAP policies and procedures
“DoD Components have largely excluded geographic combatant commands, which are responsible for detecting, deterring, and preventing threats and attacks against the United States and its territories, possessions, and bases in their respective areas of responsibility, in developing UAP policies and procedures;”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 5
DoD Components developed varying processes to collect, analyse, and identify UAP incidents
“DoD Components developed varying processes to collect, analyze, and identify UAP incidents.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 5
The DoD has not issued a comprehensive UAP response plan identifying roles, responsibilities, and coordination procedures
“The DoD has not issued a comprehensive UAP response plan that identifies roles, responsibilities, requirements, and coordination procedures for detecting, reporting, collecting, analyzing, and identifying UAP incidents.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 5
The Air Force designated UAP as a Special Interest Item requiring reporting within 24 hours via the Marauder Mission Reporting System
“the Air Force designated UAP as a "Special Interest Item," which requires aircrews to document and report UAP observations within 24 hours of engine shutdown and mission completion using the Marauder system.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 6
Army personnel use the Air Force's Marauder system because the Army has not developed its own UAP-specific processes
“An Army Senior Advisor for Science and Technology and Innovation stated that Army personnel also use the Air Force's Marauder system to document and report UAP observations because the Army has not developed its own UAP-specific processes.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 6
The OIG determined the DoD has no overarching UAP policy and lacks assurance that threats have been identified and mitigated
“We determined that the DoD has no overarching UAP policy and, as a result, it lacks assurance that national security and flight safety threats to the United States from UAP have been identified and mitigated.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 6
Recommendation 1 called on the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security to issue a DoD-wide UAP policy
“We recommend that the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, in coordination with the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office Director, issue a Department of Defense policy to integrate unidentified anomalous phenomena roles, responsibilities, requirements, and coordination procedures into existing intelligence, counterintelligence, and force protection policies and procedures.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 7, Recommendation 1
The Under Secretary agreed with Recommendation 1; the recommendation was resolved but open
“The Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and Security, responding for the OUSD(I&S) and the AARO Director, agreed with the recommendation.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 7
AARO's progress included developing an analytic framework, science plan, operational framework, and strategic communications plan
“The Under Secretary also stated that AARO's progress in detecting, identifying, and resolving UAP includes the development of an analytic framework, science plan, operational framework, a strategic communications plan, and implementing guidance on the UAP-related roles and responsibilities of the Office of the Secretary of Defense, AARO, combatant commands, Military Services, and Combat Support Agencies.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 7
The Secretary of the Navy did not provide official comments for Recommendation 3 as requested
“The Secretary of the Navy did not provide official comments for inclusion in our final report, as requested.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 8
The Secretary of the Air Force did not provide official comments for Recommendation 4 as requested
“The Secretary of the Air Force did not provide official comments for inclusion in this report, as we requested in our draft report.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 8
The Joint Staff issued guidance to geographic combatant commanders on UAP detection and reporting
“the Joint Staff issued guidance to the geographic combatant commanders on unidentified anomalous phenomena detection, reporting, collection, analysis, and identification within their area of responsibility.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 10
The OIG conducted its evaluation work from May 2021 through June 2023 under CIGIE quality standards
“We conducted the work on this evaluation from May 2021 through June 2023 in accordance with the "Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation," published in January 2012 by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency.”
Unclassified Summary of Report No. DODIG-2023-109
printed_page 11, Scope and Methodology