Ufology is the study of the Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) phenomenon. The religious studies scholar Diana Walsh Pasulka has conducted an ethnography of a variety of UFO believers and of ufology itself.1 As part of that research, Pasulka organised a small, closed conference bringing together ufologists and scientists with humanities scholars who study the UFO phenomenon; Tyler D. was not among those invited.2 Within ufology, the code of conduct expected of scientists who study UFOs in an official capacity differs from ordinary academic codes of conduct: once vetted, such researchers are required to keep their sources secret and to take oaths.3
The field encompasses two broad schools of thought, one emphasising material issues and the other addressing subjective and spiritual issues.4 The materialist school focuses on the empirical effects of UFOs, such as radiation burns on objects or people, blips on radar, and sightings, sometimes described as the “nuts and bolts” of a UFO event.5 The second school arose with the application of hypnotic regression to experiencers and with the rise of the contactee and abduction movements, and it centres on the experiencers themselves and the content of purported extraterrestrial messages.6 Budd Hopkins was an American artist, author and ufologist.7
James Master has said that Jacques Vallée has infuriated most ufologists because he will not commit to a single explanation of the phenomenon.8 According to American Cosmic, the astronomer Massimo Teodorani and the physicist Eric Davis have confirmed the existence of a parallel research tradition within ufology that is unknown to outsiders but well known within the culture of ufologists.9
Rey Hernandez has been careful to note that the Dr. Edgar Mitchell Foundation for Research into Extraterrestrial Encounters (FREE) is not an organisation devoted to ufology.10 Hernandez has said that the ufology paradigm has revealed very little about the UFO phenomenon over the past sixty years, and that a new paradigm, which he calls the Consciousness Paradigm, is needed.11 Within the field, “disclosure” is a term used to mean that UFOs have revealed themselves, or that there is public awareness of their presence.12 The Jesuit scientists of the Vatican Observatory are not actively searching for UFOs and are not engaged in ufology.13 Jason Samosa has observed that the role of the Vatican in the UFO subject is hinted at by many researchers he respects, recurrently surfacing and then disappearing, with no one willing to focus on it.14
Pasulka has related that the sociologist Brenda Denzler found ufology, and the study of anomalous aerial phenomena generally, to be overwhelmingly white and male, and more than 90 per cent Anglo-American.15 Pasulka has also said that historians of ufology, with few exceptions, overlook African American and Indigenous traditions concerning the UFO that predate the standard assumption that the UFO mythos began in 1947.16
Testimony from Samosa and Jesse Mitchells further describes alleged psychological operations (psyop) tactics directed at the UFO research community. Samosa has assessed that running a UFO researcher as a source turns them from active and passionate investigators into passive ones, waiting to be told what is going on rather than analysing and piecing together evidence themselves.17 He has assessed that cultivating researchers as sources is a practically free technique that, combined with flooding disinformation into the UFO community, does a great deal of damage.18 In his assessment, the most effective way to neutralise a UFO researcher is to run them as a source: supplying a few genuinely good pieces of information to build trust, then progressively feeding in untrue material that spreads through the community and surrounds the true information.19 Samosa has also assessed that UFO researchers turning aggressively against one another is the easiest way to destroy the research community,20 while Mitchells has assessed that infighting among UFO researchers makes the field look crazy, itself a symptom of manufactured division.21 Samosa has assessed that the UFO disclosure movement has an inevitable life cycle in which different evangelists are needed for different audiences at different stages,22 and that few people in the United Kingdom talk publicly about the UFO topic.23 He has said he worries about the religious component of the UFO subject and about an inability to cautiously distinguish what people have experienced from dogma.24 Mitchells has separately assessed cult creation around a single contactee, typically involving a prophecy of an event within the next few years, to be a recurring pattern within ufology,25 and considers it among the biggest fallacies of UFO research to treat figures such as Ronald Reagan as though they spent most of their time on UFOs, when the subject was under one per cent of their attention and their real focus was geopolitics.26